Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/43535
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRodrigo Figueiredo Morandipt_BR
dc.creatorTane Kanope Ferreira Serpapt_BR
dc.creatorAndré Gustavo Pereira de Andradept_BR
dc.creatorEmerson Silami Garciapt_BR
dc.creatorEduardo Macedo Pennapt_BR
dc.creatorEduardo Mendonça Pimentapt_BR
dc.creatorCharles Oliveira Costapt_BR
dc.creatorMário Norberto Sevílio de Oliveira Júniorpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-22T13:30:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-22T13:30:37Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-
dc.citation.volume72pt_BR
dc.citation.issue1pt_BR
dc.citation.spage265pt_BR
dc.citation.epage278pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0112pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1899-7562pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/43535-
dc.description.resumoWe aimed to create a single subjective method to assess both internal training loads and subsequent fatigue. This new training-fatigue (dose-response) scale (TFS) was composed of two similar scales with the same properties, metrics and construction criteria. These two scales were designed to rate the perceived exertion (RPETFS) and perceived fatigue (RPFTFS) in professional soccer players. Twenty-two athletes participated to establish reliability, and 15 participated to establish validity. For reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were used. For criterion validity, the Spearman’s correlation coefficient and linear regression analyses were applied. Associations between RPETFS and RPFTFS were verified by a chi square test, and a further factorial exploratory analysis was conducted. RPETFS and RPFTFS were found to be reliable (ICC 0.74 and 0.77, SEM 0.30 and 0.30, respectively) and valid. RPETFS was best explained by the internal load of the Banister training impulse (p < 0.001), while RPFTFS was best explained by the internal load of the Stagno training impulse (p < 0.001). An association was found between the scales (RPETFS and RPFTFS) in which training duration had a more substantial impact on these subjective perceptions than did training intensity (p < 0.01). RPETFS and RPFTFS scales are reliable and valid for monitoring training sessions in Brazilian professional soccer players. The simultaneous oscillations of the RPETFS and RPFTFS scores can be used by staff members to better plan weekly training programs based on dose-response ratings. Finally, training duration must be carefully controlled because it has a greater impact than intensity on subjective perceptions.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipOutra Agênciapt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE ESPORTESpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Human Kineticspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectSoccerpt_BR
dc.subjectRating of perceived exertionpt_BR
dc.subjectTraining impulsept_BR
dc.subjectRecoverypt_BR
dc.subjectOrdinal subjective scalespt_BR
dc.subject.otherFutebol - Treinamento técnicopt_BR
dc.subject.otherPercepçãopt_BR
dc.subject.otherEsforço físicopt_BR
dc.subject.otherJogadores de futebolpt_BR
dc.subject.otherFadigapt_BR
dc.subject.otherEscalaspt_BR
dc.titlePreliminary validation of mirrored scales for monitoring professional soccer training sessionspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/hukin-2019-0112pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3954-8834pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3406-4558pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0058-7967pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-8968-0089pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-9733-6659pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.