Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/48979
Type: Artigo de Periódico
Title: Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview
Authors: Crystian Bitencourt Soares de Oliveira
Christopher Gerard Maher
Rafael Zambelli de Almeida Pinto
Adrian Traeger
Chung-Wei Christine Lin
Jean-François Chenot
Maurits van Tulder
Bart Willem Koes
Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the recommendations regarding the diagnosis and treatment contained in current clinical practice guidelines for patients with non-specific low back pain in primary care. We also aimed to examine how recommendations have changed since our last overview in 2010. Method: The searches for clinical practice guidelines were performed for the period from 2008 to 2017 in electronic databases. Guidelines including information regarding either the diagnosis or treatment of non-specific low back pain, and targeted at a multidisciplinary audience in the primary care setting, were considered eligible. We extracted data regarding recommendations for diagnosis and treatment, and methods for development of guidelines. Results: We identified 15 clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care. For diagnosis of patients with non-specific low back pain, the clinical practice guidelines recommend history taking and physical examination to identify red flags, neurological testing to identify radicular syndrome, use of imaging if serious pathology is suspected (but discourage routine use), and assessment of psychosocial factors. For treatment of patients with acute low back pain, the guidelines recommend reassurance on the favourable prognosis and advice on returning to normal activities, avoiding bed rest, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and weak opioids for short periods. For treatment of patients with chronic low back pain, the guidelines recommend the use of NSAIDs and antidepressants, exercise therapy, and psychosocial interventions. In addition, referral to a specialist is recommended in case of suspicion of specific pathologies or radiculopathy or if there is no improvement after 4 weeks. While there were a few discrepancies across the current clinical practice guidelines, a substantial proportion of recommendations was consistently endorsed. In the current review, we identified some differences compared to the previous overview regarding the recommendations for assessment of psychosocial factors, the use of some medications (e.g., paracetamol) as well as an increasing amount of information regarding the types of exercise, mode of delivery, acupuncture, herbal medicines, and invasive treatments.
Subject: Dor lombar
Diagnóstico
Tratamento
language: eng
metadata.dc.publisher.country: Brasil
Publisher: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Publisher Initials: UFMG
metadata.dc.publisher.department: EEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIA
Rights: Acesso Aberto
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/48979
Issue Date: 2018
metadata.dc.url.externa: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2#Abs1
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: European Spine Journal
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non specifc low back pain.pdf945.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.