1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Use este identificador para citar o ir al link de este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/46144
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorDhelfeson Willya Douglas de Oliveirapt_BR
dc.creatorFrederico Santos Lagespt_BR
dc.creatorMaria Letícia Ramos-jorgept_BR
dc.creatorJosé Cristiano Ramos Glória Gloriapt_BR
dc.creatorPatricia Furtado Gonçalvespt_BR
dc.creatorOlga Dumont Flechapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-10T19:27:47Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-10T19:27:47Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-
dc.citation.volume20pt_BR
dc.citation.issue03pt_BR
dc.citation.spage102pt_BR
dc.citation.epage109pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn14662093pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/46144-
dc.description.resumoObjective: The aim of the present study was to determine how long the effects of laser and cyanoacrylate last when used as treatments for dentine hypersensitivity (DH). In addition, the predictive factors of DH recurrence and the prevalence of DH according to type of tooth were investigated. Materials and methods: Sixty-two patients contributed with 434 sensitive teeth. Two hundred sixteen teeth were randomized to receive laser treatment (wavelength of 795 nm) and 218 received cyanoacrylate treatment. Both treatments were applied three times at intervals of 48 hours. Dentine hypersensitivity was assessed by air stimulus at baseline and 1, 30, 90 and 180 days after treatment by a blinded researcher. Additionally, possible etiologic factors were assessed. The data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and by logistic regression. Results: Both groups had signifi cant reductions in DH. Treatment failure occurred in 276 (63.6%) treated teeth and 158 (36.4%) teeth maintained the result of the treatment until the end of the study (censored teeth). The survival rate at 6 months was 36% for laser treatment, and 36% for cyanoacrylate. There was no signifi cant difference between the survival curves (p = 0.703). Gingival recession and abfraction increased the risk of treatment failure by 2.04 (p = 0.002) and 2.76 (p < 0.001) times, respectively. Conclusion: Overall, these two approaches to DH treatment had a survival rate of 36% at 6 months. The most prevalent hypersensitive tooth is the fi rst premolar. Gingival recession and abfraction predict the recurrence of DH irrespective of patient age and sex.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - FACULDADE DE ODONTOLOGIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the International Academy of Periodontologypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectCyanoacrylatept_BR
dc.subjectDentine hypersensitivitypt_BR
dc.subjectLaserpt_BR
dc.subjectSurvival analysispt_BR
dc.subjectDentine desensitizing agentspt_BR
dc.subject.otherCyanoacrylatespt_BR
dc.subject.otherDentin sensitivitypt_BR
dc.subject.otherLaserspt_BR
dc.subject.otherSurvival analysispt_BR
dc.subject.otherDentin desensitizing agentspt_BR
dc.titleLaser and cyanoacrylate for the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity: survival analysis and predictive factorspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.perioiap.org/publications/38-july-2018pt_BR
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo de Periódico

archivos asociados a este elemento:
archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Laser and cyanoacrylate for the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity survival analysis and predictive factors.pdf343.71 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simple del elemento Visualizar estadísticas


Los elementos en el repositorio están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, salvo cuando es indicado lo contrario.