1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/58151
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorJuliana Vilela Bastospt_BR
dc.creatorVanda Helena de Faria Queirozpt_BR
dc.creatorDonnersson Bruno Alves Felíciopt_BR
dc.creatorDaniela Augusta Barbato Ferreirapt_BR
dc.creatorCláudia Borges Brasileiropt_BR
dc.creatorEvandro Neves Abdopt_BR
dc.creatorTania Mara Pimenta Amaralpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-23T18:53:13Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-23T18:53:13Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-15-
dc.citation.volume34pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1pt_BR
dc.citation.epage9pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0067pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn18068324pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/58151-
dc.description.resumoThe present study aimed to evaluate the performance of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital periapical radiographs (PR) in diagnosing external root resorption (ERR) in human permanent teeth replanted after traumatic avulsion. The samples comprised 39 permanent maxillary incisors replanted after traumatic avulsion. Digital PR and CBCT images were taken from each tooth and independently examined by 2 calibrated examiners to assess the ERR activity regarding type and extension. The degrees of agreement between both imaging examinations were determined by the mean global agreement index using SPSS software. The two imaging examinations diverged greatly in the diagnosis of the type of ERR since CBCT identified more cases as inflammatory ERR and PR as replacement ERR. A discordance level of 69.2% was observed between the two methods in the diagnosis of the type of ERR when CBCT for mesial and distal (MD) surfaces was considered and 61.5% when CBCT for mesial, distal, buccal and lingual (MD/BL) was considered. Likewise, CBCT and PR differed regarding the ERR index. PR examinations classified most cases as moderate or severe (69.2%), while CBCT examinations classified more cases as mild either in the MD surfaces analysis (41.4%) or in the analysis of the MD-BL surfaces (51.3%). In conclusion, the present results highlight a discrepancy between CBCT and digital PR performance in the diagnosis of different types and extent of ERR in replanted teeth.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Oral Researchpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subject.otherRadiographypt_BR
dc.subject.otherTraumatologypt_BR
dc.subject.otherRoot resorptionpt_BR
dc.subject.otherCone-beam computed tomographypt_BR
dc.subject.otherIncisorpt_BR
dc.subject.otherDental Implantspt_BR
dc.subject.otherTooth avulsionpt_BR
dc.titleImaging diagnosis of external root resorption in replanted permanent teethpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/a/8ggNBcM4ZcSpjB9XvCVPZnN/?lang=enpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Imaging diagnosis of external root resorption in replanted permanent teeth.pdf401.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.