1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/60266
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorNayranne Hivina Carvalhotavarespt_BR
dc.creatorCarolina Gomes Coelhopt_BR
dc.creatorSandhi m. Barretopt_BR
dc.creatorLuana Giattipt_BR
dc.creatorLarissa Fortunato Araújopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-30T19:45:44Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-30T19:45:44Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.citation.volume56pt_BR
dc.citation.issue103pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1pt_BR
dc.citation.epage10pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004064pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn15188787pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/60266-
dc.description.resumoOBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between birth weight and bone mineral content (BMC), and whether this relationship differs between men and women. METHODS: A total of 10,159 participants from the ELSA-Brasil cohort were eligible for this analysis. The outcome was the z-score of the ratio BMC (kg)/height (m). The exposure was the low birth weight (< 2.5kg). The magnitude of the associations was estimated by mean differences and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) using linear regression. All analyses were presented for the total population and stratified by sex. RESULTS: Most were women (54.98%), and the mean age was 52.72 years (SD ± 6.6). In the crude model, we observed that low birth weight was associated with a lower mean BMC/height z-score, compared to adequate birth weight (mean difference: -0.30; 95%CI: -0.39 to -0.21), and this effect was stronger in men (mean difference: -0.43; 95%CI: -0.56 to -0.30) than in women (mean difference: -0.31; 95%CI: -0.44 to -0.19). After adjusting for age, sex per total population, race/skin color, maternal education, individual education, and current weight, there was a considerable reduction in the magnitude of the association (total population: -0.10; 95%CI: -0.14 to -0.06; men: -0.13; 95%CI: -0.21 to -0.06; women: -0.13; 95%CI: -0.21 to -0.05). CONCLUSION: Low birth weight is related to BMC/height z-score in both sexes with no indication of differences by sex. The magnitude of the associations was attenuated after adjustment for the current weight.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA SOCIALpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofRevista de Saúde Pública-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectBone Densitypt_BR
dc.subjectBirth Weighpt_BR
dc.subjectEmbryonic and Fetal Developmentpt_BR
dc.subjectSex Distributionpt_BR
dc.subject.otherBone Densitypt_BR
dc.subject.otherEmbryonic and Fetal Developmentpt_BR
dc.subject.otherSex Distributionpt_BR
dc.titleBirth weight is related with bone mineral content in adulthood: results of elsa-brasilpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004064pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo de Periódico

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Birth weight is related with bone pdfa.pdf216.33 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.