Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/61013
Type: Artigo de Periódico
Title: Comparison of survival outcomes between ameloblastic carcinoma and metastasizing ameloblastoma: A systematic review
Authors: Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Roberta Rayra Martins-Chaves
Flávia Sirotheau Correa Pontes
Felipe Paiva Fonseca
Ricardo Santiago Gomez
Hélder Antônio Rebelo Pontes
Abstract: Purpose To investigate and compare the demographic data, occurrence of recurrence and metastasis, and survival prognosis between ameloblastic carcinoma (AC) and metastasizing ameloblastoma (MA), based on appropriate and currently accepted eligible diagnostic criteria, in a systematic review of the literature. Methods An electronic search was undertaken, last updated in December 2021. Eligibility criteria included publications having enough clinicopathological information to confirm the diagnosis of these tumors. Results Seventy-seven publications reporting 85 ACs and 43 MAs were included. Both tumors were more frequent in mandible and showed different clinical profiles regarding patients' sex and age. There was no difference in the estimated cumulative survival between patients diagnosed with these tumors. Metastases mainly affected the lungs, followed by cervical lymph nodes. The mean time between the first metastasis and the last follow-up was higher for MA (p = 0.021). In addition, MA patients remained alive longer than AC patients after the first metastasis diagnosis (p = 0.041). Considering only the cases that metastasized, a higher ratio of AC patients died in comparison to MA patients (p = 0.003). The occurrence of recurrence was associated with a conservative primary treatment with both AC (p < 0.001) and MA tumors (p = 0.017). Multiple recurrent events were associated with conservative primary therapies with MA (p < 0.001) but not with AC (p = 0.121). Conclusion In addition to some demographic differences, ACs that metastasize present a worse prognosis than MA. As conservative procedures are associated with multiple recurrent events, this treatment modality should be avoided for both tumors.
Subject: Carcinoma
Ameloblastoma
Neoplasias
language: eng
metadata.dc.publisher.country: Brasil
Publisher: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Publisher Initials: UFMG
metadata.dc.publisher.department: FAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIA
Rights: Acesso Aberto
Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivados 3.0 Portugal
metadata.dc.rights.uri: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pt/
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.13334
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/61013
Issue Date: 13-Jul-2022
metadata.dc.url.externa: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jop.13334
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons