Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/63848
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorEmanuella Gomesmaiapt_BR
dc.creatorCamila Mendes Dos Passospt_BR
dc.creatorFernanda Serra Granadopt_BR
dc.creatorRenata Bertazzi Levypt_BR
dc.creatorRafael Moreira Claropt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T16:55:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-07T16:55:53Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.citation.volume37pt_BR
dc.citation.issueSuppl 1pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1pt_BR
dc.citation.epage16pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/0102-311x00107220pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn16784464pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/63848-
dc.description.resumoThe study aimed to analyze the economic impact of the adoption of optimized and nutritionally balanced diets to Brazilian families, considering the Brazilian dietary guidelines and the economic disparities of the population. Data from the Brazilian Household Budget Survey from 2008-2009 (550 strata; 55,970 households) were used. About 1,700 foods and beverages purchased by the Brazilians were classified into 4 groups according to NOVA system. Lin ear programming models estimated isoenergetic diets preserving the current diet as baseline and optimizing healthier diets gradually based on the “golden rule” of the Brazilian dietary guidelines, respecting nutritional restrictions for macronutrients and micronutrients (based on international recommendations) and food acceptance limits (10th and 90th percentiles of the per capita calorie distribution from the population). The diet cost was defined based on the sum of the average cost of each food group, both in the current and optimized diets (BRL per 2,000Kcal/person/day). The economic impact of the Brazilian dietary guidelines to Brazilian household budget was analyzed by comparison the cost of the optimized diets to the cost of the current diet, calculated for the total population and by income level. Three healthier diets were optimized. Current diet cost was BRL 3.37, differed among low- and high-income strata (BRL 2.62 and BRL 4.17, respectively). Regardless of income, diet cost decreased when approaching the guidelines. However, low-income strata com promised their household budget more than two times the high-income strata (20.2% and 7.96%, respectively). Thus, the adoption of healthier eating prac tices can be performed with the same or lower budget.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentENFERMAGEM - ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEMpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofCadernos de Saúde Pública-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectEatingpt_BR
dc.subjectCosts and Cost Analysispt_BR
dc.subjectLinear Programmingpt_BR
dc.subject.otherEatingpt_BR
dc.subject.otherCosts and Cost Analysispt_BR
dc.subject.otherLinear Programmingpt_BR
dc.titleReplacing ultra-processed foods with fresh foods to meet the dietary recomendations: a matter of cost?pt_BR
dc.title.alternativeSubstituir alimentos ultraprocessados por alimentos frescos para atender as recomendações alimentares: uma questão de custo?pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00107220pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Replacing ultra-processed foods with fresh pdfa.pdf206.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.