Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/68070
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorJohn Rivapt_BR
dc.creatorMeha Bhattpt_BR
dc.creatorCarolina de Castro Martinspt_BR
dc.creatorDavid Brunarskipt_BR
dc.creatorJason Bussept_BR
dc.creatorFeng Xiept_BR
dc.creatorHolger Schünemannpt_BR
dc.creatorJan Brozekpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-03T18:55:18Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-03T18:55:18Z-
dc.date.issued2022-08-
dc.citation.volume148pt_BR
dc.citation.spage81pt_BR
dc.citation.epage92pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.011pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1878-5921pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/68070-
dc.description.resumoObjectives: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) practice guideline developers often perform systematic reviews of potential economic evaluations to inform recommendation decision-making. We aimed to identify indirectness characteristics of economic evaluations, related to GRADE evidence-to-decision (EtD) theoretical frameworks, that influence selection of these articles. Study Design and Setting: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and EconLit were systematically searched to May 2020 to identify indirectness characteristics relevant for economic evaluation transferability to GRADE EtD theoretical frameworks. Four reviewers screened citations to identify articles of any type that explored study characteristics most important or relevant to economic evaluation transferability, restricted to English language we generated frequencies of article features, used thematic analysis to summarize study characteristics, and assessed certainty in the evidence using GRADE-CERQual. Results: We included 57 articles, with a dearth of empirical literature—some may have been missed. We identified eight general themes and 28 subthemes most important to transferability from 41% of articles. Moderate-to-high confidence evidence suggested that GRADE EtD domains of population, intervention and comparison research question elements, resource use estimation and methodology, and provider and decision maker acceptability are most important indirectness study characteristics that economists consider when choosing economic evaluation outcomes for use in recommendation decision-making. Conclusion: We have identified factors important for guideline developers to consider when selecting economic evaluations as research evidence. An economic competency on the development team facilitates these endeavors. This supports the GRADE Working Group’s tenant of transparent reporting or availability of sufficient information elsewhere to assess indirectness.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Epidemiology-
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectCost-benefit analysispt_BR
dc.subjectEconomicspt_BR
dc.subjectHealth care costspt_BR
dc.subjectEvidence-based medicinept_BR
dc.subjectPractice guidelinespt_BR
dc.subjectEpidemiological research designpt_BR
dc.subject.otherCost-benefit analysispt_BR
dc.subject.otherEconomicspt_BR
dc.subject.otherHealth care costspt_BR
dc.subject.otherEvidence-based medicinept_BR
dc.subject.otherPractice guidelinept_BR
dc.subject.otherEpidemiologic research designpt_BR
dc.subject.otherGRADE Approachpt_BR
dc.titleIndirectness (transferability) is critical when considering existing economic evaluations for GRADE clinical practice guidelines: a systematic reviewpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435622000944pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.