1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/69192
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorLuciana Andrade Carneiro Machadopt_BR
dc.creatorRosa Weiss Tellespt_BR
dc.creatorLuciana Costa-silvapt_BR
dc.creatorSandhi Maria Barretopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-13T22:38:55Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-13T22:38:55Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.citation.volume20pt_BR
dc.citation.issue5pt_BR
dc.citation.spage451pt_BR
dc.citation.epage460pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0177pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1809-9246pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/69192-
dc.description.resumoBackground: Health-related control and self-efficacy beliefs can be assessed in the general population using Multidimensional Health Locus of Control-A subscales (MHLC-A) and the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), respectively. Objective: To test construct validity, internal consistency, reliability (test-retest) and ceiling and floor effects of Portuguese-Brazil versions of MHLC-A and GSES. Method: Civil servants (N=2901) enrolled in a large Brazilian cohort were included. A new version of the GSES was produced (GSES-Brazil). Procedures for cross-cultural adaptation and testing of psychometric properties followed well-accepted international guidelines. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses yielded the following indices: MHLC-A (tridimensional model): χ2[df]=223.45[132], p-value <0.01; CFI=0.87; TLI=0.85; RMSEA=0.07 (0.07-0.08); WRMR=3.00. GSES-Brazil (unidimensional model): χ2[df]=788.60[35], p-value <0.01; CFI=0.95; TLI=0.94; RMSEA=0.09 (0.08-0.09); WRMR=2.50. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC2,1) ranged from 0.57 (0.54-0.59) and 0.57 (0.47-0.65) for MHLC-A internality to 0.80 (0.79-0.81) and 0.71 (0.66-0.77) for GSES-Brazil, respectively. There was no evidence of ceiling and floor effects. Convergent validity analyses provided further support for construct validity of both scales. Conclusion: These findings support the use of the newly developed version of GSES-Brazil for the assessment of general self-efficacy of adult Brazilians. Internal consistency was lower than ideal for MHLC-A, indicating these subscales may need further refinements to provide a more psychometrically sound measure of control beliefs.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE ANATOMIA E IMAGEMpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA MÉDICApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA SOCIALpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE PROPEDÊUTICA COMPLEMENTARpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Physical Therapypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectPsychometric propertiespt_BR
dc.subjectMeasurement instrumentspt_BR
dc.subjectHealth-related control beliefspt_BR
dc.subjectSelf-efficacypt_BR
dc.subjectELSA-Brasilpt_BR
dc.subject.otherPsicometriapt_BR
dc.subject.otherInstrumentos de mediçãopt_BR
dc.subject.otherAutoeficáciapt_BR
dc.subject.otherEstudos longitudinaispt_BR
dc.titlePsychometric properties of Multidimensional Health Locus of Control - A and General Self-Efficacy Scale in civil servants: ELSA-Brasil Musculoskeletal Study (ELSA-Brasil MSK)pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbfis/a/rBvPJmDXSsbLcNMMNcbW8PQ/?lang=en#pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6303-2753pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4027-2943pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7383-7811pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Psychometric properties of Multidimensional Health Locus of Control - A and General Self-Efficacy Scale in civil servants_ ELSA-Brasil Musculoskeletal Study (ELSA-Brasil MSK).pdf293.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.