Use este identificador para citar o ir al link de este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/76876
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorMarcos Paulo Antunes de Limapt_BR
dc.creatorRenata Andrade Silvapt_BR
dc.creatorPatrícia de Castro Duartept_BR
dc.creatorSérgio da Silva Rocha Júniorpt_BR
dc.creatorStephanie Elise Muniz Tavares Brancopt_BR
dc.creatorCahuê Francisco Rosa Pazpt_BR
dc.creatorPablo Ezequiel Oteropt_BR
dc.creatorRafael Resende Faleirospt_BR
dc.creatorSuzane Lilian Beierpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T21:08:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-25T21:08:09Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12-
dc.citation.volume22pt_BR
dc.citation.spage2pt_BR
dc.citation.epage6pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2023.100315pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2451943Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/76876-
dc.description.resumoTo evaluate the sensory and motor effects promoted by a combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves using two approaches. Six calves were used, in a crossover study. Ultrasound combined with neurostimulation, was used to perform the following block combinations: the proximal approach (PA), which consisted of the association of the parasacral approach (sciatic nerve block) and ventral to the ilium approach (femoral nerve block); distal approach (DA) consisted of the association of a lateral approach to the pelvic limb approach (sciatic nerve block), and an inguinal approach, underneath the femoral trigone (femoral nerve block). Pressure algometry and motor function of the limb where evaluated. Mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) increase, and ataxia duration means were 9.5 ± 0.7 kg and 10.4 ± 3.9 hr for PA and 10.4 ± 3.9 kg and 12.7 ± 1.9 hr for DA, respectively with no significant difference. There was no significant difference between MNT elevation time andthe duration of ataxia using the same approach. The DA treatment showed significant MNT elevation in 72% of the tested regions, while the PA treatment showed an elevation in 100% regions tested. Topographic approaches closer to where the spinal nerves emerge produced a larger desensitised area.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentVET - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA E CIRURGIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary and animal sciencept_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectLocoregional anaesthesiapt_BR
dc.subjectPerineuralpt_BR
dc.subjectRegional anaesthesiapt_BR
dc.subjectRopivacainept_BR
dc.subject.otherMedicina Veterináriapt_BR
dc.subject.otherBovinospt_BR
dc.titleEffects of two different topographic approaches for combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves, guided by ultrasound and neurostimulationpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X23000327?via%3Dihubpt_BR
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo de Periódico

archivos asociados a este elemento:
archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Effects of two different topographic approaches for combined sciatic and.pdf900.73 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los elementos en el repositorio están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, salvo cuando es indicado lo contrario.