Use este identificador para citar o ir al link de este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/83615
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorGrazielle Duartede Oliveirapt_BR
dc.creatorLaélia Cristina Caseiro Vicentept_BR
dc.creatorAline Mansueto Mourãopt_BR
dc.creatorSayuri Hiasmym Guimarães Pereira Dos Santospt_BR
dc.creatorUriel Moreira Silvapt_BR
dc.creatorAmélia Augusta de Lima Frichept_BR
dc.creatorMaria Aparecida Camargos Bicalhopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-17T17:38:15Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-17T17:38:15Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.citation.volume79pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1pt_BR
dc.citation.epage10pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100440pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn18075932pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/83615-
dc.description.resumoObjective: To identify internal structure validity evidence of a dysphagia screening questionnaire for caregivers of older adults with Alzheimer’s disease dementia and/or vascular dementia. Methods: The 24-question Dysphagia Screening in Older Adults with Dementia − Caregiver Questionnaire (RaDIDQC) was administered by interviewing 170 caregivers of older people with dementia, selected by convenience at the Outpatient Reference Center for Older People. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used to assess the internal structure validity of the questionnaire, and Cronbach’s alpha was used to analyze reliability. Questions with factor loadings lower than 0.45 in magnitude were removed from the final questionnaire. Multivariate multiple linear regression was used to assess the percentage of variance explained by the remaining questions. Results: Kayser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s tests suggested that the questionnaire was adequate for EFA. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) suggested that 12 components captured at least 75 % of the total variance. The corresponding 12-factor EFA model showed a statistically significant fit, and 15 out of the 24 questions had factor loadings greater than 0.45. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.74 for the 15 questions, which explained 71 % of the total variance in the complete dataset. The questionnaire has adequate internal structure validity and good reliability. Based on EFA, RaDID-QC decreased from 24 to 15 questions. Other internal validity and reliability parameters will be obtained by administering the questionnaire to larger target populations. Conclusion: The RaDID-QC applied to caregivers of older adults with dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease and/or vascular dementia produced valid and reliable responses to screen dysphagia signs and symptom.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentICX - DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTATÍSTICApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA MÉDICApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE FONOAUDIOLOGIApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE OFTALMOLOGIA E OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofClinicspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectDementiapt_BR
dc.subjectSwallowing Disorderspt_BR
dc.subjectCaregiverspt_BR
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnairespt_BR
dc.subjectOlder adultspt_BR
dc.subjectFrail Elderlypt_BR
dc.subject.otherDementiapt_BR
dc.subject.otherDeglutition Disorderspt_BR
dc.subject.otherCaregiverspt_BR
dc.subject.otherSurveys and Questionnairespt_BR
dc.subject.otherFrail Elderlypt_BR
dc.titleScreening for dysphagia in older people with dementia: evidence of validity based on internal structure and reliability of the caregiver questionnaire - radid-qcpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593224001170?via%3Dihubpt_BR
Aparece en las colecciones:Artigo de Periódico

archivos asociados a este elemento:
archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Screening for dysphagia in older people with dementia pdfa.pdf1.51 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los elementos en el repositorio están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, salvo cuando es indicado lo contrario.