Teste de conhecimento tático processual3x3 com os pés: alternativa para a orientação esportiva

Abstract

Learning to play any Sport involves the solicitation of cognitive processes such as perception, problem solving, decision making and sending the response to the information environment. In the different manifestations of the Sport, for example, 3x3 playing in the street or at school in teaching, offering procedures to learn to play and learn while playing are held in parallel with the development of cognitive processes, as well as tactic capacity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the behavior of children tactical procedural between 08 and 14 years old, in a game situation reduced from three against three (3x3) with feet without finishing. A volunteer sample of this study consisted of 100 childrens (56 boys and 44 girls) whose mean age was 10,32 ± 1,45 years. The game allows the assessment of procedural tactical knowledge. To this end,we consider the performance or non-technical tactical behaviors common methods that are used to transport or football handling. Measures the frequency of behaviors or nontechnical individual tactical with and without the ball on offense, and marking the player with and without the ball on defense, in game time situations in direct opposition, and similar to the game situation or competition. This instrument hás a total of 16 itensto be observed, with 04 itens for each tactical situation or size (player without the ball on offense JSB, player with the ball in attack JCB, marking the player without the ball on offense MJSB, marking the player with the ball in attack MJCB). In Coeficient Content Validation (CVC), we obtained the following values for the items Clarity of speech = 0,82; Relevance practice = 0,87; and Theoretical relevance = 0,94.Moreover, the proposed final solution with 04 items explained 68,48% of variance and define satisfactorily the two factors defined within the situation of attack player without the ball (JSB) and the player with ball attack (JCB) (KMO = 0,564). In defense situation, the proposed final solution with 04 items explained 76,52% of variance and define the two factors making the player without tha ball (MJSB) and the player withthe ball (MJCB) (KMO = 0,638). The reliability of the proposed instrument was estabilished by calculating the Kappa inter-evaluators (inter-observer agreement) and intra-rater (test re-test on different days). With the results showing agreement between raters. Conclude therefore that the instrument shows validity indexes to evaluate the procedural tactical knowledge of students/athletes in the areas of the proposeddimensions for modalities that are used as a means of toes game like football and futsal.