Os crimes omissivos na sociedade contemporânea

Abstract

The present work aims to detach the rescue of the human being as the foundation of criminal law through analysis of omission crimes in contemporary society. Contemporary society hoists a belief of "boundless freedom", which is consistent with an exaggerated individualism, in an environment where the only duty attribute to human beings is the pursue of their own happiness. The same human beings who have repeatedly omitted the commitment to establish human coexistence with each other when sharing the same social reality. A dialogue between Philosophy and Sociology is established by means of the freedom´s philosophy by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), the Theory of Meaningful Action, by Max Weber (1864-1920) and the Philosophy of Ordinary Language Approach, by Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951). The integration of criminal law in this dialogue is fostered through the meaningful conception of action by Tomás Antón Salvador Vives (1939 -) and the rationalist liberalism from the First Frankfurt School of Zaczyk Rainer (1951 -). Any criminal action and relevant omission have social significance. Thus, the interaction between identity between the first and second categorical imperatives of general law from the Kantian Law, along with Semantics of Wittgenstein's use and Weberian relational bias, guide the whole Theory of Crime, with human beings at their own center of gravity. In this area, the axes of the criminally relevant omission are the social interaction, the legal criminal welfare, the standard law and the freedom of action. The validity claim of the standard criminal law is human dignity and freedom, with an emphasis on the ethics of responsibility which underlies the duty to avoid inherent omission crimes results.