Avaliação da escala de resiliência e da CD-RISC em atletas lutadores

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to correlate and compare the resilience scores indicated by the Resilience Scale (ER) and the CD-RISC 25 in the context of the struggles. Participants included 60 athletes with a mean age of 33.9 (± 9.8) years for Jiu-Jitsu athletes, 18.3 (± 3.0) years for Taekwondo athletes and 17.1 (± 6.2) of age for judo athletes. The scales were applied after the activities of the day of the athletes of Judo, Taekwondo and Jiu-Jitsu. The study respected all the procedures of the Ethics Committee being registered by the CAAE (91958318.2.0000.5149). Data were tabulated and analyzed according to the instruments' standards. For data analysis, the means and standard deviation of the scores and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov ª tests were used to verify the data normality and the Pearson Correlation Test in the CD-RISC 25 and ER scales. For the classification of the correlation results, the indexes were considered as 0.3 as negligible, from 0.3 to 0.5 as low, from 0.5 to 0.7 as moderate, from 0.7 to 0.9 as high and above 0.9 as very high (Hinkley, WIERSMA, JURS, 2003). The data of the athletes' questionnaires were tabulated in the Microsoft Excel 2013 program and the statistical calculations were performed with the program SPSS Statistics version 21.0. For ER, the averages identified were 141.12 (± 14.76) for JiuJitsu, 132.69 (± 12.80) for Taekwondo and 142.10 (± 12.32) for Judo. For the CDRISC, the averages identified were 76.19 (± 12.03) for Jiu-Jitsu, 67.31 (± 9.74) for Taekwondo and 72.52 (± 11.27) for Judo. In the correlation between the scales, Pearson's correlation analysis identified a correlation coefficient between the scales of r² = 0.29, an explained variance of 29% between the CD-RISC and ER scales and a unique variance of the 71% variables. Comparing the means of resilience levels among Judo, Taekwondo and Jiu-Jitsu athletes, no significant differences were found, except for the comparison between Judo ER and Taekwondo ER. There were higher correlations between CD-RISC and all subscales, including ER subscales, than when compared to correlations made between ER and all other subscales, except when correlating ER and its own subscales, so this study concluded that CD-RISC may have a better applicability in the context of fights than ER.