1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Evento
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/36920
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMarcelo Pinto Guimarãespt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-23T19:43:59Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-23T19:43:59Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.citation.issueUniversal Design in Yorkpt_BR
dc.citation.spage121pt_BR
dc.citation.epage130pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/978-1-61499-684-2-121pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn978-1-61499-6pt_BR
dc.identifier.sici1pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/36920-
dc.description.resumoThis paper includes some criticism in analysis of the development and implementation of the national standards for accessibility of the built environment in Brazil, i.e., the NBR9050. Currently, the 2015 version of it resembles an encyclopaedia including a variety of exotic contributions gathered historically from different sources; however, that characteristic makes it work like a puzzle that keeps alive prejudices about users' needs and disabilities. Besides, there are conflicts between recommended ideas and previous requirements from older versions. The definition of Universal Design has been published since 2004, but there is still no indication of how to make the principles work in practice. Therefore, it is very hard for city officials to assess quality of environments, and professionals have serious constraints to explore their skills further while addressing users' diversified needs. Certainly, the current NBR9050 requires further editorial work. Nevertheless, an important decision is necessary: it is important to organize information so that readers may identify in each topic whether Universal Design application can be achieved or whether the proposed technical solution may lead to construction of limited spatial adaptation and reach only some poor accommodation of users with uncommon needs. Presenting some examples in context of socially inclusive environments, the newer revised version of NBR9050 is necessary to explain about pitfalls of bad design of accessibility for discriminated disabled users. Readers should be able to establish conceptual links between the best ideas so that Universal Design could be easily understood.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentARQ - DEPARTAMENTO DE PROJETOSpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofLearning from the past, designing for the futurept_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectUniversal Designpt_BR
dc.subjectAccessibility featurespt_BR
dc.subjectRevisionpt_BR
dc.subjectTechnical Standardspt_BR
dc.subject.otherArquitetura e Urbanismopt_BR
dc.subject.otherDesenho Industrialpt_BR
dc.titleUniversal design criteria in standards and codes about accessibility of built environments in Brazilpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeCritérios de desenho universal em normas e códigos sobre acessibilidade de ambientes construídos no Brasilpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Eventopt_BR
dc.url.externahttp://www.udyork.netpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Evento

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SHTI229-0121.pdf520.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.