Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/39635
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRenato César Cardosopt_BR
dc.creatorWaldir Severiano de Medeiros Júniorpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-24T11:50:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-24T11:50:04Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.citation.volume8pt_BR
dc.citation.issue1pt_BR
dc.citation.spage172pt_BR
dc.citation.epage210pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5902/2179378633764pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2179-3786pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/39635-
dc.description.abstractStudying Schopenhauer's philoso-phy with an interested eye and keeping atten-tion to our scientific landscape is bound to re-veal interesting connections. One could easily find many insights that would later be proven relevant in different fields such as physics, bio-logy, psychology and literature. It is neurosci-ence, however, that has produced some of the most intriguing confirmations of Schopenha-uer’s philosophy. His considerations on the topic of free will have found considerable pro-of in modern day knowledge of the brain. The neurophysiologist Benjamin Libet, for exam-ple, has found compelling scientific evidence that “will” precedes conscious volition, as sus-tained almost two hundred years ago by the German thinker. Undermining the idea of free will, however, brings about serious problems for traditional ethical and legal theories. The emerging fields of Neuroethics and Neurolaw, we sustain, could profit greatly from the kind of deterministic solution (figured in the idea of a prospectivist imputability, that is, focused on the future) proposed by Schopenhauer.pt_BR
dc.description.resumoEstudar a filosofia de Schopenha-uer sem perder de vista a nossa paisagem cientí fica revela-nos conexo es interessan-tes. Poder-se-ia facilmente encontrar mui-tos insights que mais tarde seriam prova-dos relevantes em diferentes campos como na fí sica, na biologia, na psicologia e na li-teratura. Foi a neurocie ncia, entretanto, que produziu algumas das mais intrigantes confirmaço es da filosofia de Schopenhau-er. Suas consideraço es sobre o tema do livre-arbí trio encontraram provas consi-dera veis no conhecimento moderno do ce -rebro. O neurofisiologista Benjamin Libet, por exemplo, encontrou evide ncias cientí -ficas convincentes de que a "vontade" pre-cede a vontade consciente, tal como sus-tentada ha quase duzentos anos pelo pen-sador alema o. Minar a ideia de livre arbí -trio, no entanto, traz se rios problemas pa-ra as teorias e ticas e legais tradicionais. Assim, sustentamos que os emergentes campos da Neuroe tica e do Neurodireito poderiam ganhar muito com o tipo de so-luça o determinista (figurada na ideia de uma imputabilidade prospectivista, ou se-ja, voltada para o futuro) proposto por Schopenhauer.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentDIR - DEPARTAMENTO DE DIREITO DO TRABALHO E INTRODUÇÃO AO ESTUDO DO DIREITOpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVoluntaspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectSchopenhauerpt_BR
dc.subjectBenjamin Libetpt_BR
dc.subjectLiberdade da vontadept_BR
dc.subject.otherSchopenhauer, Arthur, 1788-1860pt_BR
dc.subject.otherLibet, Benjamin, 1916-2007pt_BR
dc.subject.otherFilosofiapt_BR
dc.subject.otherLiberdadept_BR
dc.subject.otherVontadept_BR
dc.titleO laboratório de Schopenhauer? Benjamin Libet e seu experimento seminalpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeSchopenhauer´s lab? Benjamin Libet and his seminal experimentpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/33764pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-8374-6462pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
O laboratório de Schopenhauer ....pdf779.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.