Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/40143
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorLiliana Pereira Limapt_BR
dc.creatorAna Cristina Resende Camargospt_BR
dc.creatorPedro Henrique Scheidt Figueiredopt_BR
dc.creatorAna Cristina Rodrigues Lacerdapt_BR
dc.creatorVanessa Amaral Mendonçapt_BR
dc.creatorHércules Ribeiro Leitept_BR
dc.creatorMariana Aguiar de Matospt_BR
dc.creatorCamila Danielle Cunha Nevespt_BR
dc.creatorVanessa Kelly da Silva Lagept_BR
dc.creatorGuilherme Pinto da Silvapt_BR
dc.creatorGladson Salomão Lopespt_BR
dc.creatorMaria Gabriela Abreu Chavespt_BR
dc.creatorJoyce Noelly Vitor Santospt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-16T13:08:43Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-16T13:08:43Z-
dc.date.issued2019-02-
dc.citation.spage1pt_BR
dc.citation.epage11pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211327pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/40143-
dc.description.resumoIntroduction: Preliminary studies have showed that the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test (ISWT) is a maximal test, however comparison between ISWT with the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CEPT) has not yet performed in the healthy woman population. Furthermore, there is no regression equation available in the current literature to predict oxygen peak consumption (VO2 peak). Thus, this study aimed to compare the ISWT with CEPT and to develop an equation to predict peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) in healthy women participants. Methods: First, the VO2 peak, respiratory exchange ratio (R peak), heart rate max (HR max) and percentage of predicted HR max (% predicted HR max) were evaluated in the CEPT and ISWT (n = 40). Then, an equation was developed to predict the VO2 peak (n = 54) and its validation was performed (n = 20). Results: There were no significant differences between the ISWT and CEPT of VO2 peak, HR max and % predicted HR max values (P>0.05), except for R peak measure in the ISWT (1.22 ± 0.13) and CEPT (1.18 ± 0.1) (P = 0.022). Therefore, both tests showed a moderate positive correlation of VO2 peak (r = 0.51; P = 0.0007), HR max (r = 0.65; P<0.0001) and R peak (r = 0.55; P = 0.0002) and the Bland-Altman analysis showed agreement of VO2 peak (bias = -0.14). The distance walked on ISWT and age explained 36.3% (R2 Adjusted = 0.363) of the variance in VO2 peak. The equation developed was VO2 peak (predicted) = 19.793 + (0.02 x distance walked)—(0.236 x age). There was no statistically significant difference between the VO2 peak measured directly and the predicted, and the Bland-Altman analysis showed agreement (bias = 1.5 ml/kg/min). Conclusion: ISWT is a maximal test showing similar results compared to the CEPT, and the predicted equation was valid and applicable for VO2 peak assessing in young adult healthy women.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPlos Onept_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectAptidão cardiorrespiratóriapt_BR
dc.subjectConsumo de oxigêniopt_BR
dc.subjectMulherespt_BR
dc.subject.otherAptidão cardiorrespiratóriapt_BR
dc.subject.otherConsumo de oxigêniopt_BR
dc.subject.otherConsumo de oxigêniopt_BR
dc.titleCardiorespiratory fitness assessment and prediction of peak oxygen consumption by Incremental Shuttle Walking Test in healthy womenpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0211327&type=printablept_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-6748-3081pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-8131pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0003-0158-7918pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.