1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/40226
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorGeisiane Rodrigues de Carvalhopt_BR
dc.creatorElenderjane Andrade de Oliveirapt_BR
dc.creatorVitor Tigre Martins Rochapt_BR
dc.creatorDaniele Sirineu Pereirapt_BR
dc.creatorLeani Souza Máximo Pereirapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-18T16:30:07Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-18T16:30:07Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.citation.volume59pt_BR
dc.citation.issue53pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1pt_BR
dc.citation.epage7pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-019-0098-0pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2523-3106pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/40226-
dc.description.resumoBackground: The World Health Organization reports that one of the main incapacitating conditions in older adults is osteomusculoskeletal disorders, and among these is low back pain. There are few instruments translated and transculturally adapted with psychometric properties evaluated for older adults with this health condition in Brazil. The Pain Response to Activity and Positioning (PRAP) questionnaire enables classification of older adults through functional performance. The objective of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation and verify the reliability of the PRAP for older Brazilian people with chronic low back pain. Methods: A cross-sectional methodological study from the international study “Back Complaints in the Elders”. We included individuals aged ≥60 years, with chronic lumbar pain complaints lasting ≥3 months. The transcultural translation and adaptation process followed the criteria proposed by Beaton and Guilhemeim, 1993. Reliability was tested using an unweighted Cohen's Kappa. Results: Thirty-six (36) older adults participated in the study (71.15 ± 7.23 years, 94.4% female). The intra-rater reliability for Low Back Pain (LBP) was between 0.50-1.00 and 0.23-0.84 for lower limbs, while the inter-rater reliability for LBP was between 0.25-0.63 and between 0.18-0.53 for lower limbs. The criteria for low back pain diagnosis showed intra and inter-rater agreement of 0.52 and 0.47, respectively. Conclusion: The Brazilian version of the instrument showed adequate reliability and ability to classify older adults in the diagnosis of LBP by reporting the performance of daily activities, and is indicated for use in the context of research and clinical practice.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Rheumatologypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectTranscultural adaptationpt_BR
dc.subjectLow back painpt_BR
dc.subjectOlder adultspt_BR
dc.subject.otherDor lombarpt_BR
dc.subject.otherIdosospt_BR
dc.subject.otherIncapacidade - Avaliaçãopt_BR
dc.titleCross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the pain response to activity and position questionnairept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.scielo.br/j/adr/a/tvDNBjQDPRT83NhVW64Xkvb/?lang=enpt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4868-9244pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7253-4392pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the pain response to activity and position questionnaire.pdf549.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.