1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/41435
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorBrenno Silvapt_BR
dc.creatorAna Carolina Teixeira Venturatopt_BR
dc.creatorLarissa Tavares Aguiarpt_BR
dc.creatorLuiz F. R. M. Filhopt_BR
dc.creatorChristina Danielli Coelho de Morais Fariapt_BR
dc.creatorJanaine C. Polesept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-06T17:27:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-06T17:27:05Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-
dc.citation.volume23pt_BR
dc.citation.issue4pt_BR
dc.citation.spage844pt_BR
dc.citation.epage849pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.05.008pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1360-8592pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/41435-
dc.description.resumoObjective: To investigate the concurrent validity of the Modified Sphygmomanometer Test (MST) with fixed stabilization, compared to the portable dynamometer, and to verify its test-retest and inter-raterreliability. Methods: Methodological study. The muscle strength of the following groups was measured: flexors and extensors of the wrist, of the hip, and of the knee and plantar flexors. The Tycos® aneroid sphygmomanometer and the Microfet 2® dynamometer were used. Stabilization was performed using the Mullingan® belt. Descriptive statistics were performed for characterization of the sample. To determine the validity of the MST with fixed stabilization, comparing it with the portable dynamometer, we investigated the correlation between the measurements obtained with the two instruments using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to investigate inter-examiner and test-retest reliability (α = 0.05). Results: 59 individuals were included (1176 evaluations). A statistically significant correlation of moderate to high magnitude (0.58 ≤ r ≤ 0.81) was observed for concurrent validity of the MST with fixed stabilization versus the portable dynamometer for all muscle groups. Regarding inter-rater reliability, it was observed statistically significant ICC considered excellent to good (0.72 ≤ r ≤ 0.94) for all muscle groups. Regarding test-retest reliability, first evaluator presented good to excellent ICC (0.64 ≤ r ≤ 0.94), while second evaluator presented good to excellent ICC (0.74 ≤ r ≤ 0.96) for all muscle groups. Conclusion: The MST with fixed stabilization is valid and reliable for clinical measurement of muscle strength and can overcome previous limitations reported in the literature.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Bodywork and Movement Therapiespt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectEvaluationpt_BR
dc.subjectMuscle strengthpt_BR
dc.subjectReproducibilitypt_BR
dc.subject.otherForça muscular - Avaliaçãopt_BR
dc.subject.otherValidade dos testespt_BR
dc.titleValidity and reliability of the Modified Sphygmomanometer Test with fixed stabilization for clinical measurement of muscle strengthpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859219301822?via%3Dihub#!pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-6503-774Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-9729pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0003-3366-1545pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.