1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/41653
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorKênia Kiefer Parreiras de Menezespt_BR
dc.creatorPatrick Roberto Avelinopt_BR
dc.creatorIza Faria Fortinipt_BR
dc.creatorMarluce Lopes Basíliopt_BR
dc.creatorLucas Rodrigues Nascimentopt_BR
dc.creatorLuci Fuscaldi Teixeira Salmelapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-13T18:38:23Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-13T18:38:23Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-
dc.citation.volume11pt_BR
dc.citation.issue8pt_BR
dc.citation.spage843pt_BR
dc.citation.epage848pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.12008pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1934-1563pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/41653-
dc.description.resumoBackground: The ABILOCO is a self-reported questionnaire, specific for individuals with stroke, for the assessment of ability of locomotion. The ABILOCO has been investigated using the Rasch model and has shown satisfactory measurement properties. However, its test-retest reliability has not been investigated. Objective: To investigate the test-retest reliability, that is, agreement, systematic and random variability of the ABILOCO Questionnaire in individuals with chronic stroke. Design: A test-retest reliability study. Setting: Research laboratory. Participants: Thirty-one individuals (21 men and 10 women; mean age, 60 years), who had poststroke hemiparesis. Intervention: Not applicable. Main outcome measurement: The ABILOCO was applied twice, on two occasions, 5 to 7 days apart. Test-retest reliability was investigated, as follows: agreement by the calculation of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs); systematic variability by the change in the mean; random variability by the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest real difference (SRD). Results: Two outliers were identified in the sample. The ICC values for the whole sample were 0.76 (CI 95% 0.56 to 0.88), whereas the SEM (SEM%) and SRD (SRD%) were 0.55 (21%) and 1.52 (58%), respectively. Conclusion: The ABILOCO showed to be reliable to be applied within clinical and research contexts for the assessment of changes in locomotion ability of a group of individuals with chronic stroke. However, it appears to be less suitable to detect changes at individual levels. Level of evidence: III.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicopt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE TERAPIA OCUPACIONALpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPM&Rpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subject.otherCapacidade motora - Mediçãopt_BR
dc.subject.otherAcidente vascular cerebralpt_BR
dc.subject.otherQuestionáriospt_BR
dc.subject.otherAvaliaçãopt_BR
dc.titleTest-retest Reliability of the ABILOCO questionnaire in Individuals with strokept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pmrj.12008pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9906-9555pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7248-4767pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-1547pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6792-0819pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8358-8636pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.