Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/42539
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMarina de Brito Brandãopt_BR
dc.creatorMarisa Cotta Mancinipt_BR
dc.creatorClaudio Ferrept_BR
dc.creatorPriscilla Rezende Pereira Figueiredopt_BR
dc.creatorRachel Helena Silva de Oliveirapt_BR
dc.creatorShirley Gonçalvespt_BR
dc.creatorMíriam Cândida Silva e Diaspt_BR
dc.creatorAndrew Michael Gordonpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-15T16:45:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-15T16:45:31Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.citation.volume38pt_BR
dc.citation.issue3pt_BR
dc.citation.spage227pt_BR
dc.citation.epage242pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2017.1407014pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1541-3144pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/42539-
dc.description.resumoAim: We compared the efficacy of hand-arm bimanual intensive training (HABIT) in two doses (90 vs. 45 hours) and two schedules of the same dose (90 vs. 2 × 45 hours) on hand and daily functioning. Method: Eighteen children with unilateral cerebral palsy were randomized to receive 6 hours of daily training over 3 weeks, totaling 90 hours (Group 90, n = 9) or receive 6 hours of daily training over 1.5 weeks, totaling 45 hours (Group 2 × 45, n = 9). After 6 months, Group 2 × 45 received an additional 45 hours. Hand (Jebsen–Taylor Test of Hand Function, Assisting Hand Assessment) and daily functioning tests (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory) were administered before, immediately after, and 6 months after interventions. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in hand and daily functioning after 90 hours (Group 90) or the first 45 hours (Group 2 × 45), without differences between groups. However, more children from Group 90 obtained smallest detectable differences in the Assisting Hand Assessment. The addition of the second bout of 45 hours (Group 2 × 45) did not lead to further improvements. Conclusions: As this study was powered to test for large differences between groups, future investigations on larger samples will be needed to compare differences at the two dosage levels.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicopt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE TERAPIA OCUPACIONALpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPhysical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatricspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectBimanual trainingpt_BR
dc.subjectCerebral palsypt_BR
dc.subjectDosagept_BR
dc.subjectHand functionpt_BR
dc.subjectInterventionpt_BR
dc.subject.otherDesempenho Físico Funcionalpt_BR
dc.subject.otherParalisia cerebralpt_BR
dc.subject.otherDosagempt_BR
dc.subject.otherMãospt_BR
dc.subject.otherTreinamentopt_BR
dc.titleDoes dosage matter? a pilot study of Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Training (HABIT) dose and dosing schedule in children with unilateral cerebral palsypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01942638.2017.1407014?journalCode=ipop20pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5192-0868pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-7415-5043pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-4370-6965pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.