Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/43236
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorFlávia Alves de Carvalhopt_BR
dc.creatorMark Elkinspt_BR
dc.creatorMarcia Rodrigues Costa Francopt_BR
dc.creatorRafael Zambelli de Almeida Pintopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-13T14:59:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-13T14:59:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-
dc.citation.volume105pt_BR
dc.citation.issue3pt_BR
dc.citation.spage354pt_BR
dc.citation.epage361pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2018.11.003pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0031-9406pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/43236-
dc.description.resumoBackground: A plain-language summary is a short and clearly stated version of a study’s results using non-scientific vocabulary that provide many advantages for patients and clinicians in the process of shared decision-making. Objectives: The primary objective was to investigate the extent to which published reports of physiotherapy interventions provide plain-language summaries. We investigate as the secondary objectives if the available plain-language summaries are at a suitable reading level for a lay person and if inclusion of plain-language summaries in these reports is increasing over time and is associated with trial quality (i.e. PEDro score). Data sources: All 4421 randomised controlled trials (RCT), systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines that included plain-language summaries indexed on Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) were included. Main outcome measures: Proportion of published reports with plain-language summaries, Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Results: The number of published reports with a plain-language summary doubled in the last 6 years. From a total of 34,444 reports indexed on PEDro, only 4421 reports had English plain-language summaries. RCTs with plain-language summaries had higher PEDro scores than RCTs without plain-language summaries (mean difference = 0.8 points, 95%CI 0.7 to 0.8). Only 2% of reports were considered at a suitable reading level by the FKGL formula and 0.1% by the FRES formula. Conclusions: Although the publication of plain-language summaries is increasing over time, the current number corresponds to only 13% of all published reports. In addition the majority of plain-language summaries are written at an advanced reading level.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPESP - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulopt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPhysiotherapypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectReadabilitypt_BR
dc.subjectSummary reportpt_BR
dc.subjectPhysiotherapypt_BR
dc.subjectHealth informationpt_BR
dc.subjectHealth consumerpt_BR
dc.subject.otherRelatóriospt_BR
dc.subject.otherResumospt_BR
dc.subject.otherFisioterapiapt_BR
dc.subject.otherMedicina baseada em evidênciaspt_BR
dc.subject.otherInformação de saúde ao consumidorpt_BR
dc.subject.otherPhysiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)pt_BR
dc.titleAre plain-language summaries included in published reports of evidence about physiotherapy interventions? analysis of 4421 randomised trials, systematic reviews and guidelines on the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031940618303444?via%3Dihub#!pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-2052-7366pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6174-2524pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2775-860Xpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.