Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/43693
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorFilipe Manuel Clementept_BR
dc.creatorHugo Borges Sarmentopt_BR
dc.creatorGibson Moreira Praçapt_BR
dc.creatorPantelis Theodoros Nikolaidispt_BR
dc.creatorThomas Rosemannpt_BR
dc.creatorBeat Knechtlept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-27T16:31:22Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-27T16:31:22Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-
dc.citation.volume10pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1pt_BR
dc.citation.epage9pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01802pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/43693-
dc.description.resumoThe purpose of this study is twofold: (i) analyze the variations of network centralities between close (difference of goals equal to one) and unbalanced (difference of goals equal to or greater than two) scores; and (ii) compare the centrality levels between playing positions. The passing sequences that occurred during the 64 matches played by the 32 national teams that participated in the 2018 FIFA World Cup were analyzed and coded. The network centralities of degree prestige and degree centrality were calculated based on the weighted adjacency matrices built from the passing sequences. The results reveal that higher degree centralities of midfielders occurred in unfavorable (lost) unbalanced scores (p = 0.046; ES (effect size) = 0.472). Moreover, in favorable (won) matches the higher values of degree centrality of central defenders (p = 0.014; ES: 0.458) and defensive midfielders (p = 0.004; ES: 0.715) were also found in unbalanced scores. The comparisons between positions revealed that the highest and significant degree prestige levels were found in defensive midfielders in both close (12.10%) and unbalanced scores (10.95%). In conclusion, it is possible to observe that winning by an unbalanced score significantly increased the centrality levels of the wingers and forwards in comparison to close scores. Moreover, it was also found that independent of the final score or the unbalanced score level, the defensive midfielders were the most prominent or recruited players during the passing sequences.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipOutra Agênciapt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE ESPORTESpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychologypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectGraph theorypt_BR
dc.subjectSocial Network Analysispt_BR
dc.subjectObservational analysispt_BR
dc.subjectAssociation footballpt_BR
dc.subjectPerformance analysispt_BR
dc.subjectNotational analysispt_BR
dc.subject.otherTeoria dos grafospt_BR
dc.subject.otherRedes de relações sociaispt_BR
dc.subject.otherObservaçãopt_BR
dc.subject.otherJogadores de futebolpt_BR
dc.subject.otherDesempenhopt_BR
dc.subject.otherCopa do mundo (Futebol)pt_BR
dc.titleVariations of network centralities between playing positions in favorable and unfavorable close and unbalanced scores during the 2018 FIFA World Cuppt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01802/fullpt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-9813-2842pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-8681-0642pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-9971-7308pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-8030-7122pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-6436-6306pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-2412-9103pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.