Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/44674
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorCarolina Bosso Andrépt_BR
dc.creatorBrenda Paula Figueiredo Almeida Gomespt_BR
dc.creatorThais Mageste Duquept_BR
dc.creatorPedro Luiz Rosalenpt_BR
dc.creatorDaniel Chi Ngai Chanpt_BR
dc.creatorGlaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosanopt_BR
dc.creatorMarcelo Gianninipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-29T18:06:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-29T18:06:58Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-
dc.citation.volume72pt_BR
dc.citation.spage123pt_BR
dc.citation.epage129pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.011pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn01437496pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/44674-
dc.description.resumoObjectives This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity (by agar disk diffusion test, AD), viability of S. mutans biofilm (VB), and effect on resin-dentin interface (RDI) of six adhesive systems. Methods Three adhesives containing antibacterial components (Gluma 2Bond (G2B)/glutaraldehyde, Clearfil SE Protect (CSP)/MDPB and Peak Universal Bond (PUB)/chlorhexidine) and the corresponding adhesives with similar composition, but without antibacterial agents (Gluma Comfort Bond, GCB; Clearfil SE Bond, CSB and Peak LC Bond, PLB) were evaluated. AD was determined measuring the extent of halo formation following application of adhesives and control groups (light cured or not) to cultures of four strict anaerobic and four facultative bacteria. For VB, a UA159 biofilm was grown on adhesive-coated hydroxyapatite discs for five days, collected and processed to count the number of viable cells. For RDI analysis, adhesives were applied according to manufacturers' recommendations and teeth were restored with resin composite, sectioned to obtain bonded slices and visualized by SEM. Results An inhibition halo was observed for G2B (strict anaerobic/light cured and not light cured), CSP (strict anaerobic and facultative/light cured and not light cured) and PUB (strict anaerobic and facultative/not light cured). PUB when light cured produced an inhibition halo on L. casei and S. mutans only. G2B and CSP significantly reduced the viability of S. mutans. Adhesives containing antimicrobial compounds had no detectable effect on RDI. Conclusion The MDPB-containing bonding agent showed better results of inhibition for all oral pathogens tested and a decrease of viability of Streptococcus mutans biofilm, among the adhesives testedpt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPESP - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulopt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesivespt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectAntibacterial adhesivespt_BR
dc.subjectDentinept_BR
dc.subjectHybrid layerpt_BR
dc.subject.otherAnti-infective agentspt_BR
dc.subject.otherDentin-bonding agentspt_BR
dc.subject.otherBiofilmspt_BR
dc.subject.otherStreptococcus mutanspt_BR
dc.titleAntimicrobial activity, effects on streptococcus mutans biofilm and interfacial bonding of adhesive systems with and without antibacterial agentpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014374961630207Xpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.