1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/45449
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorAnna Gabriella Camacho Presottopt_BR
dc.creatorValentim Adelino Ricardo Barãopt_BR
dc.creatorCláudia Lopes Brilhante Bheringpt_BR
dc.creatorMarcelo Ferraz Mesquitapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-24T17:45:47Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-24T17:45:47Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-
dc.citation.volume122pt_BR
dc.citation.issue1pt_BR
dc.citation.spage38pt_BR
dc.citation.epage45pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.019pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn00223913pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/45449-
dc.description.resumoStatement of problem. Selective laser melting (SLM) is a promising additive technology for clinical practice, but data on dimensional precision assessed by marginal fit combined with stress and strain investigations of implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) are lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to verify whether the SLM additive manufacturing technology provides better dimensional precision for 3-unit FPD frameworks than subtractive manufacturing with soft metal block (SMB) milling and the standard casting technique. Material and methods. Thirty 3-unit implant-supported FPDs with Co-Cr frameworks were made by the casting, SMB milling, and SLM methods (n=10). The marginal fit between the framework and the implant abutment was evaluated with photoelastic (PH) and strain gauge (SG) models. Stress and strain in the implant-supported system were measured by quantitative PH and SG analyses after prosthetic screw tightening. Data were subjected to the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann- Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation test (a=.05). Results. The framework manufacturing method affected the marginal fit (P<.001), stress, and strain values (P<.05). The SLM group showed the best mean ±standard deviation marginal fit (mm) (PH model: 8.4 ±3.2; SG model: 6.9 ±2.1) in comparison with SMB milling (PH model: 42.3 ±15.7; SG model: 41.3 ±15.3) and casting (PH model: 43.5 ±27.8; SG model: 41.3 ±24.6) (P<.05). SLM showed lower mean ±standard deviation stress and strain values (60.3 ±11.6 MPa; 91.4 ±11.1 mstrain) than casting (225.5 ±142.8 MPa; 226.95 ±55.4 mstrain) and SMB milling (218.6 ±101.7 MPa; 289.7 ±89.3 mstrain) (P<.05). A positive correlation was observed between fit and stress or strain for all groups (P<.05). Conclusions. Three-unit FPD frameworks made using the SLM technology showed better dimensional precision than those obtained with the casting or SMB milling methodspt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthetic Dentistrypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subject.otherDenture partial fixedpt_BR
dc.subject.otherDental Implantspt_BR
dc.titleDimensional precision of implant-supported frameworks fabricated by 3d printingpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391319300988pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.