Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/45450| Type: | Artigo de Periódico |
| Title: | Viability of bovine teeth as a substrate in bond strength tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| Authors: | Monize Ferreira de Figueiredo Amanda Carolina Neiva Leijôto Lannes Marcela Carolina Nunes Rodrigues Lilian Capanema Nogueira Nayara Kelly Lyrio Ferraz Allysson Nogueira Moreira Mônica Yamauti Lívia Guimarães Zina Claúdia Silami de Magalhães |
| Abstract: | Purpose: To assess whether bovine teeth can be used as viable alternatives for human teeth in tensile and shear bond strength testing. Materials and Methods: Articles were selected from Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, LILACS-Bireme, and BBO electronic databases using keywords obtained from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Of 1540 potentially eligible studies, 157 were selected for full text analysis. Five independent reviewers (Kappa = 0.89) selected the studies, abstracted information, and assessed quality based on standardized scales. After the analysis, 78 studies comparing bovine teeth to human teeth were found. Only 18 studies comparing bovine and human substrates in bond strength tests were included in the systematic review and 13 in the meta-analysis. Two authors independently selected the studies, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. Mean differences were obtained by comparing tensile and shear bond strengths between human and bovine teeth (permanent and deciduous) and considering enamel and dentin separately (subgroup analysis). Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan5.1, with a random-effect model, at a 5% significance level. Results: No significant difference was found between human and bovine teeth in tensile tests (p = 0.41) for dentin (p = 0.86), but there was a difference for enamel (p = 0.01). Regarding shear bond strength, no significant difference was found between human and bovine teeth (p = 0.16) either for enamel (p = 0.07) or dentin (p = 0.68). Regarding shear bond strength on deciduous teeth, no significant difference was found between human and bovine substrates (p = 0.54), either for enamel (p = 0.42) or dentin (p = 0.05). Most studies were at high (low or unclear) risk of bias. Conclusions: In shear bond strength testing, bovine teeth can be a suitable alternative for permanent and deciduous human teeth, for both enamel and dentin substrates. However, they may not be suitable for enamel tensile bond strength testing. The findings are based on low quality studies (considerable heterogeneity) and should be interpreted with caution |
| Subject: | Dentin Dental enamel Review |
| language: | eng |
| metadata.dc.publisher.country: | Brasil |
| Publisher: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
| Publisher Initials: | UFMG |
| metadata.dc.publisher.department: | FAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORA FAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA SOCIAL E PREVENTIVA |
| Rights: | Acesso Restrito |
| metadata.dc.identifier.doi: | 10.3290/j.jad.a41636 |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/45450 |
| Issue Date: | 28-Dec-2018 |
| metadata.dc.url.externa: | https://www.quintessence-publishing.com/deu/en/article/843441 |
| metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: | The Journal of Adhesive Dentristry |
| Appears in Collections: | Artigo de Periódico |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.