1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/45453
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorNogueirapt_BR
dc.creatorDanilo Rocha Diaspt_BR
dc.creatorCláudio Rodrigues Lelespt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-24T18:18:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-24T18:18:55Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-14-
dc.citation.volume44pt_BR
dc.citation.issue12pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1004pt_BR
dc.citation.epage1016pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/joor.12550pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0305182Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/45453-
dc.description.resumoThe single-implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) has been proposed as an alternative for edentulous patients who are poorly adapted to their dentures due to low retention and stability of the conventional mandibular complete denture (CD). However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness of SIMO, which can be measured by examining patient perception of treatment effects. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the comparative results of CD and SIMO treatments using patient-reported outcome measures. A literature search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central databases. The search included studies published up to July 2017. The focus question was: 'Do single-implant mandibular overdentures improve patient-reported outcomes compared to conventional complete dentures in edentulous patients?' Eligible studies were randomised clinical trials (RCT) and prospective studies. After initial screening for eligibility and full-text analysis, 11 studies were included for data extraction and quality assessment (five parallel-group RCTs, two crossover RCTs and four prospective studies). All studies reported marked improvement in satisfaction with the dentures and quality of life measures after SIMO treatment, irrespective of variations in implant treatment protocols and retention systems. Methodological considerations revealed a lack of evidence from RCTs on the comparative effectiveness of the two treatment strategies. Hence, although available evidence suggests considerable improvement in patient-reported outcomes following the insertion of a single implant to retain a mandibular denture, further well-designed comparative studies between SIMO and CD are required to improve the level of evidence and to support the indication of SIMO treatment in routine practicept_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral Rehabilitationpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectComplete denturept_BR
dc.subjectOverdenturept_BR
dc.subjectPatient satisfactionpt_BR
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcomespt_BR
dc.subjectQuality of lifept_BR
dc.subjectSystematic reviewpt_BR
dc.subject.otherQuality of lifept_BR
dc.subject.otherReviewpt_BR
dc.subject.otherDenture completept_BR
dc.subject.otherPatient satisfactionpt_BR
dc.subject.otherPatient reported outcome measurespt_BR
dc.titleMandibular complete denture versus single-implant overdenture: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomespt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joor.12550pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.