1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/46055
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRafael Scaf de Molonpt_BR
dc.creatorFrederico Santos Lagespt_BR
dc.creatorCarolina Poquechoque Riverapt_BR
dc.creatorAna Paula de Souza Falonipt_BR
dc.creatorRogerio Margonarpt_BR
dc.creatorThallita Pereira Queirozpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-06T19:53:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-06T19:53:13Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-01-
dc.citation.volume18pt_BR
dc.citation.issue12pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1122pt_BR
dc.citation.epage1129pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2187pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn15263711pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/46055-
dc.description.resumoAim: The aim of this nonrandomized controlled preliminary clinical trial was to compare treatment using short and conventional implants in the posterior region of the mandible after prosthesis installation by means of clinical, resonance frequency, and radiographic analyses. Materials and methods: A total of 10 patients with 40 dental implants already installed were included in this study. Four implants were installed for each subject, in which the length of the implants (short and conventional) was distributed according to the reminiscent alveolar bone in the left and right side of the mandible. All implants received splinted prosthesis after the osseointegration period. Analyses were performed immediately after prosthesis installation (T1), and 3 (T2) and 6 months (T3) after prosthesis placement. Results: The 6-month survival and success rates were 100% for the short and conventional implants. Probing depths (PDs) after 6 months did not show statistical differences between short and conventional implants. All groups showed mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) values above 60 in all periods evaluated, demonstrating great implant stability, and no differences were found between groups at T3. Radiographic measurements showed an increased bone loss for conventional implants compared with short implants in all the three periods evaluated. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that treatment of resorbed posterior regions in the mandible with shorter dental implants is as reliable as treatment with conventional implants after 6 months of splinted prosthesis installation. Clinical significance: Short implants might be considered a predictable treatment alternative to bone augmentation or extensive surgical techniques in regions of restricted vertical bone height in the posterior region of the mandiblept_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - FACULDADE DE ODONTOLOGIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Contemporary Dental Practicept_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectAlveolar bone losspt_BR
dc.subjectBone resorptionpt_BR
dc.subjectDental implantspt_BR
dc.subjectDental prosthesispt_BR
dc.subjectImplant supportedpt_BR
dc.subject.otherAlveolar bone losspt_BR
dc.subject.otherBone resorptionpt_BR
dc.subject.otherDental implantspt_BR
dc.subject.otherDental prosthesispt_BR
dc.titleEvaluation of short and regular implants after prosthesis placement in the mandible: a nonrandomized controlled clinical trialpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.thejcdp.com/abstractArticleContentBrowse/JCDP/19/18/12/3872/abstractArticle/Articlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Evaluation of short and regular implants after prosthesis placement in the mandible a nonrandomized controlled clinical trial.pdf305.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.