1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/46146
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorGlaciele Maria de Souzapt_BR
dc.creatorDhelfeson Willya Douglas de Oliveirapt_BR
dc.creatorFrederico Santos Lagespt_BR
dc.creatorIghor Andrade Fernandespt_BR
dc.creatorSaulo Gabriel Moreira Falcipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-10T20:03:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-10T20:03:52Z-
dc.date.issued2018-08-
dc.citation.volume14pt_BR
dc.citation.issue8pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1205pt_BR
dc.citation.epage1216pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.04.018pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn15507289pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/46146-
dc.description.resumoBackground: The effects of bariatric surgery can reflect in the oral cavity and can cause alter- ations in oral health. This high prevalence of oral alterations in the pre and post-operative periods has been highlighted in different studies. Objectives: To investigate the effect of bariatric surgery on periodontal status through a system- atic review. Methods: Electronic search was conducted in PubMed, VHL, Web of Science, Science direct, Scopus, and Cochrane databases through May 2017. Manual search, gray literature, and counter- refence of included articles were also conducted. Eligibility criteria included observational studies that reported periodontal outcomes before and after bariatric surgery. Results: Search strategy resulted in 1878 articles. Following the selection process, nine studies were included in the qualitative analysis and five in the meta-analysis. Three cross-sectional studies showed risk of bias score ranging from 5 to 6 stars, and Cohort studies scored from 6 to 9 stars out of 9 possible stars on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The quantitative analysis showed that clinical attachment level (MD: 0.07; CI95% −0.17 to 0.31), gingival index (MD: −0.28; CI95% −1.68 to 1.11), percentage of bleeding sites (MD: −0.21; CI95% −0.77 to 0.35), and pocket probing depth (MD: 0.08 CI95% −0.14 to 0.31) were not different before and after bariatric surgery. However, the plaque index was lower after than before bariatric surgery (MD: −1.29; CI 95% −2.34 to −0.24). Conclusions: Plaque index can be improved after bariatric surgery. The present systematic review investigated the association between bariatric surgery and peri- odontal status from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. A systematic search strategy was developed until May 2017. The results of this systematic review allowed the conclusion that the plaque index can be improved after bariatric surgery.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - FACULDADE DE ODONTOLOGIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofSurgery for Obesity and Related Diseasespt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectObesitypt_BR
dc.subjectBariatric surgerypt_BR
dc.subjectPeriodontal diseasespt_BR
dc.subject.otherPeriodontal diseasespt_BR
dc.subject.otherObesitypt_BR
dc.subject.otherBariatric surgerypt_BR
dc.subject.otherPeriodontal indexpt_BR
dc.subject.otherSystematic reviewpt_BR
dc.subject.otherDental plaquept_BR
dc.titleRelationship between bariatric surgery and periodontal status: a systematic review and meta-analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550728918302430?via%3Dihubpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.