Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/46557
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorAmanda de Mello Fabiãopt_BR
dc.creatorBruna Marin Fronzapt_BR
dc.creatorCarolina Bosso Andrépt_BR
dc.creatorVanessa Cavalli Gobbopt_BR
dc.creatorMarcelo Gianninipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-24T21:56:25Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-24T21:56:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-09-
dc.citation.volume34pt_BR
dc.citation.spage723pt_BR
dc.citation.epage732pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1817722pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn01694243pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/46557-
dc.description.resumoTo evaluate the microtensile dentin bond strength (BS) and dentin-adhesive morphology of three self-etching bonding systems and three universal adhesives applied in self-etching mode. Four single-step adhesives: G-Premio BOND (GPB), Bond Force II (BOF), Prime&Bond Active (PBA), and Adhese Universal (ADU); and two two-steps adhesives: Clearfil SE Bond (CSB) and Clearfil SE Bond 2 (CS2) were tested. Dentin surfaces of extracted third molars were prepared for microtensile bond strength test using adhesives applied according to the manufacturers’ instructions and restored with resin composite. Restored teeth (n = 8) were sectioned to obtain beam samples that were tested after 24 h and 1 year of water storage. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA repeated measures and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). The micromorphology of dentin-adhesive interfaces (n = 3) was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 2.000× magnification. Self-etching adhesives exhibited different bond strength values at 24 h evaluation, which ranged from 20.7 to 77.9 MPa. PBA, ADU, CSB, and CS2 showed significantly higher dentin bond strength than GPB and BOF. These two single-step adhesives presented the lowest dentin bond strengths for both storage times, and interfacial study by SEM analysis revealed short and few resin tags formations. Water-storage for 1 year did not reduce the dentin bond strength of all adhesives tested. All self-etching and universal adhesives tested presented stable bond strength over one year of water storage. Both two-step self-etching adhesives yielded immediate and long-term higher dentin bond strength than most single-step adhesives testedpt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicopt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectDental adhesivespt_BR
dc.subjectDentin bond strengthpt_BR
dc.subjectSelf etching adhesivespt_BR
dc.subject.otherDental cementspt_BR
dc.subject.otherResin cementspt_BR
dc.subject.otherDentinpt_BR
dc.titleMicrotensile dentin bond strength and interface morphology of different self-etching adhesives and universal adhesives applied in self-etching modept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01694243.2020.1817722pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.