1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/46600
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorVanessa Pereira Limapt_BR
dc.creatorMarcelo Vellosopt_BR
dc.creatorFabiana Damasceno Almeidapt_BR
dc.creatorBianca Louise Carmona Rochapt_BR
dc.creatorGiane Amorim Ribeiro Samorapt_BR
dc.creatorTânia Janaudis Ferreirapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T18:16:41Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-25T18:16:41Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.citation.volume34pt_BR
dc.citation.issue10pt_BR
dc.citation.spage806pt_BR
dc.citation.epage812pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1425786pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1532-5040pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/46600-
dc.description.resumoBackground: The unsupported upper-limb exercise (UULEX) and 6-min peg board ring tests (6PBRTs) have been developed to measure peak unsupported arm exercise capacity and arm endurance, respectively, in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These tests are valid and reproducible in this population; however, the reproducibility of healthy adults is currently unknown. Objective: To determine the within-day test–retest reliability of the UULEX and 6PBRT in healthy adults. Method: The study included 41 healthy adults, aged 38.3 ± 17.9 years old, who performed both tests, twice each on the same day, with a 30-min rest in between. Before and immediately after the tests, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), perception of exertion, and arm fatigue were measured. Time to perform the test and number of rings moved were recorded for the UULEX and 6PBRT, respectively. Results: The UULEX was reproducible on Bland–Altman analysis with lower and upper limits of agreement: 2.40 and −2.49 min, respectively (bias = −0.05; p = 0.817) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.85 (p < 0.0001) for time in minutes for the first and second tests. The 6PBRT was not reproducible on Bland–Altman analysis with lower and upper limits of agreement of 31.64 and −114.54 (bias = −41.45; p < 0.0001) and ICC = 0.91 (p < 0.0001) for the number of rings moved. Conclusion: UULEX is a reliable test in healthy adults. Only one test is adequate when measuring peak unsupported arm exercise capacity using the UULEX in healthy adults, while more than two tests may be needed to measure arm endurance using the 6PBRT.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPhysiotherapy Theory and Practicept_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectUpper extremitypt_BR
dc.subjectExercisept_BR
dc.subjectReliabilitypt_BR
dc.subjectEndurancept_BR
dc.subjectCOPD and exercise tolerancept_BR
dc.subject.otherMembros superiorespt_BR
dc.subject.otherExercícios físicospt_BR
dc.subject.otherTestes de esforçopt_BR
dc.subject.otherConfiabilidadept_BR
dc.subject.otherTolerância ao exercíciopt_BR
dc.titleTest–retest reliability of the unsupported upper-limb exercise test (UULEX) and 6-min peg board ring test (6PBRT) in healthy adult individualspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09593985.2018.1425786?scroll=top&needAccess=truept_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0349-3248pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2352-8954pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-081Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-9047-7555pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-5102-369Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0944-3791pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.