1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/48114
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorLuan Simõespt_BR
dc.creatorLuci Fuscaldi Teixeira Salmelapt_BR
dc.creatorLívia de Castro Magalhãespt_BR
dc.creatorBritt Stugept_BR
dc.creatorGlória Elizabeth Carneiro Laurentinopt_BR
dc.creatorElaine Wanderleypt_BR
dc.creatorRaphaela Barrospt_BR
dc.creatorAndrea Lemospt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-16T13:57:15Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-16T13:57:15Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.citation.volume41pt_BR
dc.citation.issue5pt_BR
dc.citation.spage425pt_BR
dc.citation.epage433pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.10.008pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1532-6586pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/48114-
dc.description.resumoObjective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate test-retest reliability, construct validity, and internal consistency of the Brazilian version of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ-Brazil). Methods: Analysis of the measurement properties was carried out in 4 steps. Step 1 was the pilot study, on which basis 4 hypotheses were formulated. These hypotheses were tested during the next step (construct validity, step 2) by completion of the questionnaire by the 2 groups (in pain [n = 105] and not in pain [n = 52]). For implementation of the PGQ-Brazil in the group with pain, we calculated the internal consistency (step 3) and, 7 days later, test-retest reliability (step 4) by re-application of the instrument in this group. Results: First, the PGQ-Brazil was able to discriminate between these groups (construct validity). Second, test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients for Activities subscale [0.97 with 95% confidence interval of 0.95-0.98] and Symptoms subscale [0.98 with 95% confidence interval of 0.97-0.98] and κ coefficient between 0.50 and 0.89 for the items) was found to be good; the Bland-Altman test indicated satisfactory agreement. The Rasch analysis indicated good internal consistency, and the instrument's ability to divide the participants into at least 3 levels of skills was confirmed. In contrast, a ceiling effect was observed, as 24% of pregnant women exhibited skills superior to what the PGQ-Brazil could evaluate. Conclusions: The PGQ-Brazil had good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity in assessment of limitations in activities and symptoms of pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeuticspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectDisabilitypt_BR
dc.subjectEvaluationpt_BR
dc.subjectPainpt_BR
dc.subjectPelvic girdle painpt_BR
dc.subjectPregnancypt_BR
dc.subject.otherIncapacidade - Avaliaçãopt_BR
dc.subject.otherDorpt_BR
dc.subject.otherDor pélvicapt_BR
dc.subject.otherGravidezpt_BR
dc.titleAnalysis of test-retest reliability, construct validity, and internal consistency of the brazilian version of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnairept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016147541730115X?via%3Dihubpt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8358-8636pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3391-2607pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0631-0512pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.