1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/48384
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorGessyca Spagnuolopt_BR
dc.creatorChristina Danielli Coelho de Morais Fariapt_BR
dc.creatorBruna Adriana da Silvapt_BR
dc.creatorAngélica Cristiane Ovandopt_BR
dc.creatorJoyce Gomes-Osmanpt_BR
dc.creatorAlessandra Swarowskypt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-22T18:22:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-22T18:22:13Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.citation.volume42pt_BR
dc.citation.issue4pt_BR
dc.citation.spage465pt_BR
dc.citation.epage472pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-172379pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1053-8135pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/48384-
dc.description.resumoAbstract: BACKGROUND:The Timed up and go test (TUG), the Five times sit-to-stand test (FTSTS) and the Bed Mobility test (BMT) are widely used in clinical practice for Parkinson Disease (PD). However, no reported studies have evaluated the responsiveness to group physical therapy intervention (GPTI). OBJECTIVE:To verify if TUG, FTSTS and BMT were responsive to GPTI. METHODS:Thirty individuals with PD were assessed prior to and after an 8-week evidence-based GPTI. Paired t test was used to determine statistically significant change pre-and post-intervention. Internal responsiveness (IR) was classified with the standardized response mean (SRM). A 5-point Likert scale assessed self-perceived performance by the subjects after the intervention. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the accuracy and cut-off scores for identifying participants who had shown improvement. RESULTS:GPTI was efficient in improving real (p≤0.001) and self-perceived mobility performance in all measures. All tests were responsive to changes: the IR varied from medium to high (SRM = 0.7–1.5); the cut-off point for TUG test was >2.2 s, for FTSTS test was >2.5 s and for BM test >1.4 s. CONCLUSIONS:The TUG, FTSTS and BMT were responsive to the GPTI and accurately detected meaningful clinical changes. Our results provide an important information about the clinical application of these tests in PD individuals.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroRehabilitationpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectParkinson diseasept_BR
dc.subjectMobilitypt_BR
dc.subjectResponsivenesspt_BR
dc.subjectPhysiotherapypt_BR
dc.subject.otherDoença de Parkinsonpt_BR
dc.subject.otherMovimentopt_BR
dc.subject.otherFisioterapiapt_BR
dc.subject.otherTestespt_BR
dc.titleAre functional mobility tests responsive to group physical therapy intervention in individuals with Parkinson’s disease?pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://content.iospress.com/articles/neurorehabilitation/nre172379pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-9729pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5098-3258pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0535-0208pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.