Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/48767
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRogério Lacerda-Santospt_BR
dc.creatorRhaíssa Ferreira Canuttopt_BR
dc.creatorJosé Lucas Dos Santos Araújopt_BR
dc.creatorFabiola Galbiatti de Carvalhopt_BR
dc.creatorEliseu Aldrighi Münchowpt_BR
dc.creatorTaís de Souza Barbosapt_BR
dc.creatorMatheus Melo Pithonpt_BR
dc.creatorEmanuel Braga Regopt_BR
dc.creatorLeniana Santos Nevespt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-06T15:59:25Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-06T15:59:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-
dc.citation.volume14pt_BR
dc.citation.issue03pt_BR
dc.citation.spage467pt_BR
dc.citation.epage482pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0040-1708329pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn13057456pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/48767-
dc.description.resumoThis systematic review was focused on evaluating tooth autotransplantation, consider ing its impacts on the teeth, bone, soft tissues, and aesthetics in orthodontic patients. A bibliographic search was conducted without limitations on year of publication or lan guage in the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Medline Complete, Cochrane, Clinical Trials, and Trials Central. For triage of articles, indications, surgical planning, orthodontic movement, risk factors for treatment, and long-term follow-ups were con sidered. For outcomes, the results with reference to teeth, alveolar bone, periodontal tissues, and esthetic satisfaction were considered. Risk of bias was evaluated using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies-MINORS. The results showed 10 con trolled clinical trials, and no randomized clinical trials were found. The selected studies included 715 patients and 934 autotransplanted teeth among which there were premo lars, molars, and anterior teeth evaluated in the long term, indicating that orthodontics associated with autotransplantation indicated a result that was generally clinically accept able. The quality of the set of evidence was considered medium due to the presence of different methodological problems, risk of bias, and significant heterogeneity in the evaluated studies. There was a sufficient body of evidence that justified autotransplan tation in patients who needed orthodontic movement. In teeth, there was an increase in root resorption influenced by orthodontics, but without impacting on the general clinical result in the long term. Bone and periodontal tissue do not appear to be affected by orthodontics. The patient’s aesthetic satisfaction was not considered in the studiespt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dentistrypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subject.otherSystematic reviewpt_BR
dc.subject.otherOrthodonticspt_BR
dc.subject.otherRoot resorptionpt_BR
dc.subject.otherSurvival ratept_BR
dc.titleEffect of orthodontic treatment on tooth autotransplantation: systematic review of controlled clinical trialspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/issue/10.1055/s-010-49270pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.