1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/48780
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorCrystian Bitencourt Soares de Oliveirapt_BR
dc.creatorMark Russell Elkinspt_BR
dc.creatorÍtalo Ribeiro Lemespt_BR
dc.creatorDanilo de Oliveira Silvapt_BR
dc.creatorRonaldo Valdir Brianipt_BR
dc.creatorHenrique Luiz Monteiropt_BR
dc.creatorFábio Mícolis de Azevedopt_BR
dc.creatorRafael Zambelli de Almeida Pintopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T12:22:43Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-09T12:22:43Z-
dc.date.issued2018-05-
dc.citation.volume22pt_BR
dc.citation.issue3pt_BR
dc.citation.spage177pt_BR
dc.citation.epage183pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.09.009pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1809-9246pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/48780-
dc.description.resumoBackground: Systematic reviews provide the best evidence about the effectiveness of healthcare interventions. Although systematic reviews are conducted with explicit and transparent methods, discrepancies might occur between the protocol and the publication. Objectives: To estimate the proportion of systematic reviews of physical therapy interventions that are registered, the methodological quality of (un)registered systematic reviews and the prevalence of outcome reporting bias in registered systematic reviews. Methods: A random sample of 150 systematic reviews published in 2015 indexed on the PEDro database. We included systematic reviews written in English, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish. A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews tool was used. Relative risk was calculated to explore the association between meta-analysis results and the changes in the outcomes. Results: Twenty-nine (19%) systematic reviews were registered. Funding and publication in a journal with an impact factor higher than 5.0 were associated with registration. Registered systematic reviews demonstrated significantly higher methodological quality (median = 8) than unregistered systematic reviews (median = 5). Nine (31%) registered systematic reviews demonstrated discrepancies between protocol and publication with no evidence that such discrepancies were applied to favor the statistical significance of the intervention (RR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.63–2.12). Conclusion: A low proportion of systematic reviews in the physical therapy field are registered. The registered systematic reviews showed high methodological quality without evidence of outcome reporting bias. Further strategies should be implemented to encourage registration.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Physical Therapypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectRegistrypt_BR
dc.subjectOutcome reporting biaspt_BR
dc.subjectQualitypt_BR
dc.subjectSystematic reviewspt_BR
dc.subjectPhysical therapypt_BR
dc.subject.otherRevisão sistemáticapt_BR
dc.subject.otherQualidade, acesso e avaliação da assistência à saúdept_BR
dc.subject.otherFisioterapiapt_BR
dc.titleA low proportion of systematic reviews in physical therapy are registered: a survey of 150 published systematic reviewspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355517301223?via%3Dihubpt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6911-7018pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2052-7366pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9245-287Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0753-2432pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0452-7753pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6639-1532pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4187-7058pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2775-860Xpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.