1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/48821
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorPatrick Roberto Avelinopt_BR
dc.creatorLívia Castro Magalhãespt_BR
dc.creatorIza de Faria Fortinipt_BR
dc.creatorMarluce Lopes Basíliopt_BR
dc.creatorKênia Kiefer Parreiras Menezespt_BR
dc.creatorLuci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmelapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-10T14:02:51Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-10T14:02:51Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.citation.volume40pt_BR
dc.citation.issue11pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1310pt_BR
dc.citation.epage1317pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1284908pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1464-5165pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/48821-
dc.description.resumoPurpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cross-cultural validity of the Brazilian version of the ABILOCO questionnaire for stroke subjects. Materials and methods: Cross-cultural adaptation of the original English version of the ABILOCO to the Brazilian–Portuguese language followed standardized procedures. The adapted version was administered to 136 stroke subjects and its measurement properties were assessed using Rash analysis. Cross-cultural validity was based on cultural invariance analyses. Results: Goodness-of-fit analysis revealed one misfitting item. The principal component analysis of the residuals showed that the first dimension explained 45% of the variance in locomotion ability; however, the eigenvalue was 1.92. The ABILOCO-Brazil divided the sample into two levels of ability and the items into about seven levels of difficulty. The item-person map showed some ceiling effect. Cultural invariance analyses revealed that although there were differences in the item calibrations between the ABILOCO-original and ABILOCO-Brazil, they did not impact the measures of locomotion ability. Conclusions: The ABILOCO-Brazil demonstrated satisfactory measurement properties to be used within both clinical and research contexts in Brazil, as well cross-cultural validity to be used in international/multicentric studies. However, the presence of ceiling effect suggests that it may not be appropriate for the assessment of individuals with high levels of locomotion ability.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicopt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofDisability and Rehabilitationpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectStrokept_BR
dc.subjectLocomotion abilitypt_BR
dc.subjectCross-cultural adaptationpt_BR
dc.subjectValiditypt_BR
dc.subjectRasch analysispt_BR
dc.subject.otherAcidente vascular cerebralpt_BR
dc.subject.otherLocomoção humana - Aspectos fisiológicospt_BR
dc.subject.otherComparação transculturalpt_BR
dc.subject.otherValidação de métodopt_BR
dc.titleCross-cultural validity of the ABILOCO questionnaire for individuals with stroke, based on Rasch analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09638288.2017.1284908pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7248-4767pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3391-2607pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-1547pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1591-7140pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9906-9555pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8358-8636pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.