1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/50647
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMohamad Nagibou Wadipt_BR
dc.creatorKarina Maria Salvatore de Freitaspt_BR
dc.creatorDaniel Salvatore Freitaspt_BR
dc.creatorRodrigo Hermont Cançadopt_BR
dc.creatorRenata Cristina Gobbi de Oliveirapt_BR
dc.creatorRicardo Cesar Gobbi de Oliveirapt_BR
dc.creatorGuilherme Jansonpt_BR
dc.creatorFabricio Pinelli Valarellipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-03T18:18:25Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-03T18:18:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-07-
dc.citation.volume2020pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1pt_BR
dc.citation.epage9pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7083940pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn16878728pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/50647-
dc.description.resumoObjective. The aim of this study was to compare the profile attractiveness between orthodontic camouflage of the Class III malocclusion and the predictive tracing simulating orthognathic surgery evaluated by dentists and laypeople. Settings and sample population. The sample consisted of 21 patients (9 male; 12 female) with Class III malocclusion treated with orthodontic camouflage and Class III intermaxillary elastics. Material and Methods. The mean initial age of the patients was 24.38 years (SD 3.32), and the mean ANB angle was −1.91° (SD 0.83°). Patients presented skeletal Class III and normal growth patterns. Initial and final lateral cephalograms of each patient were used. The initial cephalogram was used to perform the treatment simulation of orthognathic surgery, and its silhouette was compared to the silhouette obtained from the final cephalogram after Class III orthodontic camouflage. A subjective analysis of profile attractiveness was performed by 47 laypeople and 60 dentists, with scores from 1 (less attractive) to 10 (most attractive). Mann–Whitney tests were used to compare profile attractiveness between the orthodontic treatment and the predictive tracing groups and between dentists and laypeople. Results. The predictive tracing of orthognathic surgery showed to be statistically significantly more attractive (mean score 4.57, SD 2.47) than that of the Class III camouflage orthodontic treatment (mean score 4.22, SD 2.40), with a mean numerical but significant difference of 0.35 (SD 2.01) (). Laypeople were more critical than dentists in evaluating profile attractiveness, but numerical difference between the groups was also small. Conclusion. The profile silhouette of predictive tracing simulating orthognathic surgery showed to be more attractive than that of Class III camouflage orthodontic treatment; however, differences were small but statistically significant. Laypeople showed to be more critical than dentists.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Dentistrypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subject.otherOrthodonticspt_BR
dc.subject.otherMalocclusion angle class iiipt_BR
dc.subject.otherOrthognathic surgerypt_BR
dc.titleComparison of profile attractiveness between class iii orthodontic camouflage and predictive tracing of orthognathic surgerypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2020/7083940/pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparison of profile attractiveness between class iii orthodontic camouflage and predictive tracing of orthognathic surgery.pdf2.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.