Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/50705
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorJulie-Heide-Miyazaki Watanabept_BR
dc.creatorFrancisco Fitarellipt_BR
dc.creatorDaniel Salvatore de Freitaspt_BR
dc.creatorRodrigo Hermont Cançadopt_BR
dc.creatorRenata Cristina Gobbi de Oliveirapt_BR
dc.creatorFabricio Pinelli Valarellipt_BR
dc.creatorKarina Maria Salvatore Freitaspt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-07T16:48:25Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-07T16:48:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-04-01-
dc.citation.volume12pt_BR
dc.citation.issue4pt_BR
dc.citation.spagee348pt_BR
dc.citation.epagee353pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttp://https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56750doi:10.4317/jced.56750pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn19895488pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/50705-
dc.description.resumoBackground This study aimed to compare the facial profile attractiveness of Class III borderline patients after surgical or compensatory orthodontic treatment. Material and Methods The sample consisted of 60 borderline Class III malocclusion patients, divided into two groups: Group 1 (Surgical): 30 patients (16 male; 14 female) treated with orthodontic fixed appliances and bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Mean initial age was 20.05 years (s.d.=2.40) and mean treatment time was 2.23 years (s.d.=0.82). Group 2 (Compensatory): 30 patients (13 male; 17 female) treated compensatorily with fixed appliances and Class III elastics. Mean initial age was 18.53 years (s.d.=4.35) and mean treatment time was 2.08 years (s.d.=0.67). Silhouettes of the facial profile were constructed obtained from the pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms and evaluated by orthodontists (N=41, 22 females and 19 males, mean age of 35.65 years), assigning scores from 1 (least attractive) to 10 (most attractive). Intergroup comparison of profile attractiveness was performed by Mann-Whitney test. For intragroup comparison of initial and final stages, the Wilcoxon test was used. Results At initial stage, the compensatory group presented a statistically significant greater attractiveness of the profile than the surgical group. With treatment, the surgical group presented significantly more improvement in facial profile than the compensatory group. At the final stage, profile attractiveness of surgical and compensatory groups was similar. Conclusions The facial profile attractiveness is similar in Class III patients after orthognathic surgery or compensatory orthodontic treatment. However, surgery provided more improvement in profile attractiveness than the compensatory treatment in Class III patientspt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistrypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectMalocclusionpt_BR
dc.subjectAngle Class IIIpt_BR
dc.subjectOrthognathic surgerypt_BR
dc.subjectCorrective Orthodonticspt_BR
dc.subject.otherOrthodontics correctivept_BR
dc.subject.otherMalocclusionpt_BR
dc.subject.otherMalocclusion angle class iiipt_BR
dc.subject.otherOrthognathic surgerypt_BR
dc.subject.otherOrthodontic appliances fixedpt_BR
dc.titleComparison of the facial profile attractiveness in class iii borderline patients after surgical or compensatory orthodontic treatmentpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195682/pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.