1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Trabalhos Acadêmicos
  3. Dissertações e Teses
  4. Pós-Graduação em Economia
  5. Dissertações de Mestrado
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/51021
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor1Igor Viveirospt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6291986841918006pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lizía de Figueiredopt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor-co2Mehtap Hisarciklilarpt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Ronaldo Nazarépt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Thiago Henrique Carneiro Rios Lopespt_BR
dc.creatorThales Souza Limapt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7476420626640431pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-17T20:47:42Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-17T20:47:42Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-13-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/51021-
dc.description.resumoPreferences for income redistribution (PfR) may be affected by multiple individual characteristics such as age, gender, health, income, social class, ideology, race and beliefs. Using OLS estimations and treating likert-scale variables as continuous, Alesina & Giuliano (2011) showed that these attributes matter to the formation of preferences for redistribution. We first argue that we should test the relation between these characteristics and PfR by treating these variables as categoricals, in order to properly understand the relation between each step and the formation of PfR. We do so by running LSDV models, comparing our results to the ones found in their paper and adding the last two waves of the World Value Survey (WVS). Alongside many studies in the field, Alesina & Giuliano (2011) pool multiple sets of international surveys, such as the WVS, and control for time and country fixed effects. We also argue that the context in which each survey was taken may affect the formation of PfR, so we propose a different approach to the time analysis: to run separate models, one for each point of time and compare the coefficients. We corroborate the findings in Alesina & Giuliano (2011) for income, ideology and gender and show that our specifications allowed us to see that different income levels and ideological granularities affect PfR differently. We also find that the context seems to matter for the formation of PfR, however individual aspects ate the main driver to the formation of PfR.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicopt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Economiapt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectPreferences for Redistributionpt_BR
dc.subject.otherRendapt_BR
dc.subject.otherDistribuiçãopt_BR
dc.subject.otherCapitalpt_BR
dc.subject.otherEconomiapt_BR
dc.titleFormation of preferences for income redistribution: a worldwide study from 1989 to 2020pt_BR
dc.title.alternativeFormação de preferências por redistribuição de renda: um estudo mundial de 1989 a 2020pt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR
Appears in Collections:Dissertações de Mestrado

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
dissertação_2802.pdf2.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.