1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/51340
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMariana Dias Modapt_BR
dc.creatorAndré Gustavo de Lima Godaspt_BR
dc.creatorJuliana Cezarino Fernandespt_BR
dc.creatorThaís Yumi Umeda Suzukipt_BR
dc.creatorAna Paula Albuquerque Guedespt_BR
dc.creatorAndré Luis Fraga Brisopt_BR
dc.creatorAna Karina Bedran Russopt_BR
dc.creatorPaulo Henrique dos Santospt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-29T19:46:44Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-29T19:46:44Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.citation.volume9pt_BR
dc.citation.issue1pt_BR
dc.citation.spage01pt_BR
dc.citation.epage09pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12287pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn20411618pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/51340-
dc.description.resumoAim The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of resin-based composites subjected to a thermocycling procedure. Methods A total of 192 specimens were divided into 24 groups, according to composite materials (Filtek Z250, Point 4, Renamel Nanofill, Filtek Supreme Plus, Renamel Microfill, and Premise) and finishing and polishing systems (Sof-Lex Pop On, Super Snap, Flexidisc, and Flexidisc+Enamelize). The specimens were subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles). Results Filtek Supreme Plus showed the lowest surface roughness values before thermocycling. After thermocycling, Filtek Supreme Plus continued to have the lowest surface roughness, with a statistically-significant difference for the other materials. After thermocycling, there was no statistically-significant difference among all the polishing techniques studied. Conclusions The thermocycling was concluded as being able to change composite resins' surface roughness, whereas different finishing and polishing methods did not result in surface roughness changes after thermocyclingpt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofInvestigative and Clinical Dentistrypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subject.otherSurface propertiespt_BR
dc.subject.otherResin compositept_BR
dc.titleComparison of different polishing methods on surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resinspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jicd.12287pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.