Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/52119
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorBruna de Oliveira Reispt_BR
dc.creatorAndré Gustavo de Lima Godaspt_BR
dc.creatorThaís Yumi Umeda Suzukipt_BR
dc.creatorTiciane Cestari Fagundes Tozzipt_BR
dc.creatorAndré Luis Fraga Brisopt_BR
dc.creatorPaulo Henrique dos Santospt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-17T22:37:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-17T22:37:39Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-12-
dc.citation.volume18pt_BR
dc.citation.issue02pt_BR
dc.citation.spage145pt_BR
dc.citation.epage152pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.ohpd.a43355pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn17579996pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/52119-
dc.description.resumoPurpose: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength of dentine/self-adhesive resin cement interface after several treatments on a dentine surface. Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight human molars were selected and divided into four groups: no treatment (control (C)); 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX); 25% polyacrylic acid (PA); and 23 ppm dispersive solution of silver nanoparticle (SN). Prepolymerised TPH resin composite (Dentsply) blocks were luted on the dentine surface using RelyX U200 self-adhesive resin cement (3M ESPE). Microtensile bond strength was measured (MPa) in a universal testing machine 24 h and 6 months after the bonding process. The fractured specimens were examined in an optical microscope and classified according to the fracture pattern. A representative sample of each group was observed by scanning electronic microscope. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test to compare the mean among the groups (p <0.05). Results: The highest microtensile bond strength values after 24 h were found for the PA group (13.34 ± 6.36 MPa), with no statistically significant difference for the C group (9.76 ± 3.11 Mpa). After 6 months, the highest microtensile bond strength values were found for the C group (9.09 ± 3.27 Mpa), with statistically significant difference only for the CHX group (2.94 ± 1.66 MPa). There was statistically significant difference only for the PA group when comparing the periods studied. Regardless of the surface treatment applied, there were more adhesive failures in both periods of time. Conclusion: Dentinal pretreatment with PA, as well as use of SN before the bonding procedure of self-adhesive resin cement to dentine, may be alternative bonding protocols.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPESP - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulopt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofOral Health & Preventive Dentistrypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subject.otherDentinpt_BR
dc.subject.otherResin cementspt_BR
dc.subject.otherTensile strengthpt_BR
dc.subject.otherComposite resinspt_BR
dc.subject.otherAdhesivespt_BR
dc.subject.otherChlorhexidinept_BR
dc.titleDo different pretreatments of dentine surface affect the bond strength with a self-adhesive resin cement?pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.quintessence-publishing.com/deu/en/article/842278pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.