Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/52950
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorKarolline Alves Vianapt_BR
dc.creatorAnelise Daherpt_BR
dc.creatorLucianne Cople Maia de Fariapt_BR
dc.creatorPaulo Sérgio Sucasas da Costapt_BR
dc.creatorCarolina de Castro Martinspt_BR
dc.creatorSaul Martins de Paivapt_BR
dc.creatorLuciane Ribeiro de Rezende Sucasas da Costapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-08T21:24:25Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-08T21:24:25Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-
dc.citation.volume5pt_BR
dc.citation.issue34pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1pt_BR
dc.citation.epage5pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0192-xpt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2046-4053pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/52950-
dc.description.resumoBackground: Some sedatives used in children and adolescents can affect memory function. Memory impairment of traumatic experience can minimize the chance of future psychological trauma. Knowledge about the potential of different sedatives to produce amnesia can help in the decision-making process of choosing a sedative regimen. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effect of different sedatives on memory of perioperative events in children and adolescents. Methods/design: Electronic databases and other sources, such as trial registers, gray literature, and conference abstracts will be searched. Randomized controlled trials will be included that assess memory of perioperative events in children and adolescents 2–19 years old receiving sedative drugs as premedication or as agents for procedural sedation in a medical or dental settings. The outcomes will be loss of memory after and before sedative administration (anterograde and retrograde amnesia). Two independent reviewers will perform screening, study selection, and data extraction. Disagreement at all levels will be resolved by consensus or by involving a third reviewer. Assessment of the risk of bias of included studies will be performed according to “Cochrane Collaboration’s Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials.” Clinical and methodological heterogeneity across studies will be evaluated to determine if it is possible to combine or not combine study results in a meta-analysis. Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic review that specifically addresses this question. Findings from the review will be useful in the decision-making process about the best sedative for minimizing recall of the medical/dental event and possible psychological trauma.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofSystematic Reviews-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectConscious sedationpt_BR
dc.subjectAmnesiapt_BR
dc.subjectMemorypt_BR
dc.subjectSystematic reviewpt_BR
dc.subject.otherConscious sedationpt_BR
dc.subject.otherAmnesiapt_BR
dc.subject.otherMemorypt_BR
dc.subject.otherSystematic reviewpt_BR
dc.titleMemory effects of sedative drugs in children and adolescents - protocol for a systematic reviewpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-016-0192-xpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.