Use este identificador para citar o ir al link de este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/53285
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.advisor1Verlaine Freitaspt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8054342158614782pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Rodrigo Antonio de Paiva Duartept_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Ricardo Miranda Nachmanowiczpt_BR
dc.creatorCaio Victor Lemospt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0559004088417225pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-14T14:27:13Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-14T14:27:13Z-
dc.date.issued2023-02-28-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/53285-
dc.description.resumoThe aim of the present study is to contribute to the debate on the relevance of the judgment of taste to the whole of the argumentative economy of Kant’s critical project. The chosen perspective here is the argument that one can see this judgment as a clue to the validity of our attempt to systematize a posteriori cognition. First, the study presents Kant’s acknowledgment that it is not possible for us a priori to be sure of the success of this attempt, given the great diversity that nature’s forms might present. A priori we can go as far as presupposing this possibility, either in the form of the regulative use of theoretical reason’s principle of completeness or in the form of the heautonomous principle of the technique of nature, which governs the activity of the reflecting power of judgment. In each case, there is an effort toward systematization made by the faculty that is featured. Therefore, the analysis of the first proposal occupies the second moment of the study; and the analysis of the second proposal, the third. Afterward, the study then debates the judgment of taste within this theme. This judgment, which Kant classifies as a reflecting aesthetic judgment, is the vivification of the faculty of pleasure by means of the harmonious free play of the faculties of the understanding and imagination, as a result of one’s contact with a representation whose conceptual determination is in this case irrelevant. Because this free play corresponds to the relation necessary to cognition in general, this judgment is able to claim subjective universality; consequently, this judgment also presents formal purposiveness: the interpretation, also with a subjective character, that the beautiful object is favorable to the labors of the power of judgment.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOSOFIApt_BR
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Filosofiapt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectTastept_BR
dc.subjectNaturept_BR
dc.subjectSystematizationpt_BR
dc.subject.otherFilosofia - Tesespt_BR
dc.subject.otherNatureza - Tesespt_BR
dc.subject.otherEstética - Tesespt_BR
dc.titleBeauty and a posteriori cognition in Kantpt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR
Aparece en las colecciones:Dissertações de Mestrado

archivos asociados a este elemento:
archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Beauty and a posteriori cognition in Kant.pdf577.46 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los elementos en el repositorio están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, salvo cuando es indicado lo contrario.