Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/53784
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorJoão Esteves Barbosa Netopt_BR
dc.creatorSilvio Segundo Salej Higginspt_BR
dc.creatorJacqueline Veneroso Alves da Cunhapt_BR
dc.creatorAntonio Carlos Andrade Ribeiropt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-22T21:10:35Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-22T21:10:35Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.citation.volume13pt_BR
dc.citation.issue6pt_BR
dc.citation.spage231pt_BR
dc.citation.epage259pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2016.13.6.4pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1808-2386pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/53784-
dc.description.abstractEste trabalho testa uma das duas hipóteses estabelecidas sobre o capital social, do ponto de vista da análise de redes sociais: a autonomia estrutural. O teste se aplica a um estudo de caso: a redes de coautoria acadêmica dos programas de ciências contábeis do Brasil, entre o período 2002-2010. Foram feitas, também, análises sobre as dinâmicas de seletividade presentes nesta rede específica: critérios de escolha intertemporal, endogamia institucional e escolhas mutuas por produtividade. Foram verificadas: correlações negativas entre constraint dos autores e o índice de produtividade acadêmica, escolhas intertemporais em cascata e escolhas endogâmicas por critérios institucionais e de produtividade.pt_BR
dc.description.resumoSocial capital has been mobilized as an explanatory variable in various empirical studies, but these studies have been unable to overcome the ambiguities inherent in a pre-scientific notion. The present study tests structural autonomy, one of the two established hypotheses on social capital, from the point of view of social network analysis. The test is applied in a case study of the academic co-authorship networks of accounting science programs in Brazil during the period from 2002-2010. The dynamics of selectivity present in this specific network, i.e., criteria of intertemporal choice, institutional endogamy and mutual choice by productivity, were also analyzed. We observed that there were negative correlations between the authors’ constraints and their academic productivity indices, cascading intertemporal choices and endogamous choices according to institutional and productivity criteria.pt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFCE - DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIAS ECONÔMICASpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Business Reviewpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectCapital Socialpt_BR
dc.subjectAutonomia Estruturalpt_BR
dc.subjectRedes de coautoriapt_BR
dc.subjectSeletividadept_BR
dc.subject.otherCapital Socialpt_BR
dc.subject.otherAdministraçãopt_BR
dc.titleSocial apital and selectivity in academic co-authorship networks: the case of accounting sciences in Brazilpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeCapital social e seletividade em redes de coautoria acadêmica: o caso das ciências contábeis no Brasilpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/97pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5197-2166pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3573-0578pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2522-3035pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2196-4143pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.