Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/54016
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorNayara Mussi Montezept_BR
dc.creatorAna Maria Dos Santos Rodriguespt_BR
dc.creatorGabriela Barbosa Pires Fagundespt_BR
dc.creatorLaís Bhering Martinspt_BR
dc.creatorMaria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correiapt_BR
dc.creatorLuana Caroline Santospt_BR
dc.creatorAntônio Lúcio Teixeirapt_BR
dc.creatorAdaliene Versiani Matos Ferreirapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-26T19:56:40Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-26T19:56:40Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.citation.volume36pt_BR
dc.citation.spage140pt_BR
dc.citation.epage150pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutos.2021.03.006pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2667-2685pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/54016-
dc.description.resumoBackground & Aims: The better equation to predict resting metabolic rate (pRMR) to use for overweight individuals mainly after weight loss is unclear. This study aimed to identify the best equation to pRMR in overweight adult women before and after a nutritional intervention aiming to lose weight. Methods: Thirty overweight adult women were enrolled in this study. Subjects underwent 6-month energy-restricted diet intervention. Anthropometrics and body composition measures were evaluated. Nine equations that are widely used to pRMR were performed based on anthropometric and body composition parameters. Measured RMR (mRMR) was obtained by indirect calorimetry. A new equation to predict resting metabolic rate (npRMR) was also developed by multiple regression analysis based on anthropometric and body composition variables. The validity of the equations was investigated through comparisons, accuracy, and agreement tests. Results: Before the nutrition intervention, only the Mifflin equation was similar to mRMR, with a mean difference of 12kcal and 83% of accuracy. The mean weight loss was 4.2% after 6 months. Following weight loss, only the Owen equation was similar to mRMR, with a mean difference of 33 kcal. However, this equation showed low accuracy (63%). All the others equations showed reduction of accuracy, increase of bias and overestimation of RMR. A npRMR was calculated, and this showed a lower mean difference to mRMR with 70% of accuracy. Conclusions: Out of the nine resting metabolic rate equations evaluated only the Mifflin equation was similar to mRMR before intervention. Interestingly, after weight loss none of the assessed equations were reliable to pRMR. Based on that we propose a new equation that showed greater accuracy and lower mean difference when compared with mRMR.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicopt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentENF - DEPARTAMENTO DE ENFERMAGEM MATERNO INFANTIL E SAÚDE PÚBLICApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentENF - DEPARTAMENTO DE NUTRIÇÃOpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofClinical nutrition open sciencept_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectResting metabolic ratept_BR
dc.subjectPredictive equationspt_BR
dc.subjectOverweight womenpt_BR
dc.subjectWeight losspt_BR
dc.subjectIndirect calorimetrypt_BR
dc.subject.otherMetabolismo basalpt_BR
dc.subject.otherSobrepesopt_BR
dc.subject.otherRedução de pesopt_BR
dc.subject.otherCalorimetria indiretapt_BR
dc.titleLow accuracy of predictive equations for resting metabolic rate in overweight women after weight losspt_BR
dc.title.alternativeBaixa precisão de equações preditivas para taxa metabólica de repouso em mulheres com sobrepeso após perda de pesopt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268521000206?via%3Dihubpt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3534-1262pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3654-0140pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9814-8649pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3503-4302pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9836-3704pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9621-5422pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2256-8652pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.