Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/54842
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorFeliciana Lage de Oliveira Marinhopt_BR
dc.creatorNelson Luiz Linon Dos Santospt_BR
dc.creatorSuzane Pretti Figueiredo Nevespt_BR
dc.creatorLeonardo de Souza Vasconcellospt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-12T20:13:01Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-12T20:13:01Z-
dc.date.issued2020-08-13-
dc.citation.volume15pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1pt_BR
dc.citation.epage11pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal. pone.0237438pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn19326203pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/54842-
dc.description.resumoRapid tests (RTs), also known as point-of-care tests, usually release results within 30 min utes with no need for a qualified staff, equipment, or laboratory structure. The Brazilian Ministry of Health published a resolution in 2013, recommending the use of RTs for the diagnosis of HIV infection, where one positive RT must be followed by another different RT. This was meant to increase the chance of proper diagnosis in specific settings and special populations. However, data comparing and validating the different HIV RTs available in Brazil are scarce. Therefore, the present study seeks to evaluate eight anti-HIV RTs available in the Brazilian market regarding their analytical performance: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and accuracy. We also evaluated the agreement between kits (Kappa index) and the quality of the reading pat tern of the tests. This was an observational, analytical, and concordance study, in which pre viously defined positive and negative samples, based on their serological pattern for anti HIV antibodies (chemiluminescent immunoassay—ECLIA—used as screening and West ern Blot used as the confirmatory test) were tested. Analytical performance and Kappa index were calculated, considering a 95% CI and p<0.05. This study identified differences in the performances of the eight tested kits. Six out of eight RTs showed good performance and can be used in the routine laboratory and health care units as screening tests. Regard ing the quality of the RT band reading pattern, two brands had several samples showing quite faint bands, thus compromising its use in clinical and laboratory settings.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE PROPEDÊUTICA COMPLEMENTARpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPLOS ONE-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectHIVpt_BR
dc.subjectSensibilidade e Especificidadept_BR
dc.subjectteste laboratorial remotopt_BR
dc.subjectTeste rápidopt_BR
dc.subject.otherHIVpt_BR
dc.subject.otherSensibilidade e Especificidadept_BR
dc.subject.otherSoropositividade para HIVpt_BR
dc.subject.otherUnidades de Diagnóstico Rápidopt_BR
dc.titlePerformance evaluation of eight rapid tests to detect hiv infection: a comparative study from Brazilpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237438pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.