Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/55528
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorAmália Morenopt_BR
dc.creatorMarcela Filié Haddadpt_BR
dc.creatorMarcelo Coelho Goiatopt_BR
dc.creatorEduardo Passos Rochapt_BR
dc.creatorWirley Gonçalves Assunçãopt_BR
dc.creatorHumberto Gennari Filhopt_BR
dc.creatorEmerson Gomes dos Santospt_BR
dc.creatorMariana Vilela Sônegopt_BR
dc.creatorDaniela Micheline dos Santospt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-29T12:05:29Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-29T12:05:29Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-01-
dc.citation.volume10pt_BR
dc.citation.issue5pt_BR
dc.citation.spageZC84pt_BR
dc.citation.epageZC87pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7860%2FJCDR%2F2016%2F16638.7816pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0973709Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/55528-
dc.description.resumoIntroduction The use of removable partial denture (RPD) is considered as low-cost and common treatment option to rehabilitate edentulous areas. Aim This study aimed to investigate the epidemiological data of patients rehabilitated with removable partial denture (RPD) in order to assess treatment survival rate and failures. Materials and Methods Epidemiological data and medical records of patients treated with RPD between 2007 and 2012 at the RPD discipline of a Brazilian University (Aracatuba Dental School- UNESP) were evaluated as well as dental records of patients who underwent RPD treatments (fabrication or repairs) between 2000 and 2010. Factors such as gender, age, presence of systemic disease, main complaint, edentulous arch, period and cause of denture replacement and the prosthesis characteristics were recorded. The chi-square test was used to assess the differences between the variables and the Kaplan Meyer to assess the survival of the RPDs evaluated. Results A total of 324 maxillary RPD and 432 mandibular RPD were fabricated. Most of the patients were women aging 41 to 60-year-old. The number of mandibular RPD Kennedy class I (26%) was statistically higher for the maxillary arch (p<.05). There was no association between main complaint to gender or the presence of systemic disease. The lingual plate was the most common major connector used in the mandible (32%). The main reason for altering the design of replaced RPDs were changes during treatment plan. Conclusion The number of patients who require RPD is large; most of RPDs are Kennedy Class I. A good treatment plan is very important for achieving a positive treatment outcome, and it is strictly related to the survival ratept_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Researchpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectspt_BR
dc.subject.otherDental prosthesispt_BR
dc.subject.otherSurvival ratept_BR
dc.subject.otherEpidemiologypt_BR
dc.subject.otherMandiblept_BR
dc.subject.otherJaw, edentulouspt_BR
dc.titleEpidemiological data and survival rate of removable partial denturespt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4948543/pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Epidemiological data and survival rate of removable partial dentures.pdf1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.