1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/55841
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorCristina Batista Miamotopt_BR
dc.creatorLeandro Silva Marquespt_BR
dc.creatorLucas Guimarães Abreupt_BR
dc.creatorSaul Martins de Paivapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-05T19:29:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-05T19:29:39Z-
dc.date.issued2017-11-
dc.citation.volume88pt_BR
dc.citation.issue2pt_BR
dc.citation.spage144pt_BR
dc.citation.epage150pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2319/052117-344.1pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1945-7103pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/55841-
dc.description.resumoObjective: To evaluate and compare two treatment protocols to correct anterior dental crossbite in the mixed dentition. Materials and Methods: Thirty children, 8–10 years of age, participated. Individuals were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 15 children treated with an upper removable appliance with finger springs; group 2, 15 children treated by bonding resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement bite pads on the lower first molars. The 30 participants were evaluated before treatment (T1) and 12 months after treatment began (T2). The variables evaluated included overjet, perimeter of the maxillary arch, intercanine distances in the maxilla and mandible, SNA, SNB, ANB, and U1.NA. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, paired t-test and Student's t-test. Effect sizes and confidence intervals were also calculated. Results: Group 1 showed a significant increase in overjet (P < .001), intercanine distance in the maxilla (P = .006), intercanine distance in the mandible (P = .031), and U1.NA (P = .002). Group 2 showed a significant increase in overjet (P = .008), intercanine distance in the mandible (P = .005), and U1.NA (P < .001). For all the evaluated variables, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups. Conclusions: No significant differences were observed between the two protocols: use of a removable maxillary biteplate with finger springs and bonding of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement bite pads on the lower first molars, for the correction of anterior crossbite in the mixed dentition.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofThe Angle Orthodontist-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectChildpt_BR
dc.subjectMalocclusionpt_BR
dc.subjectAnterior crossbitept_BR
dc.subjectMixed dentitionpt_BR
dc.subjectInterceptive orthodonticspt_BR
dc.subject.otherChildpt_BR
dc.subject.otherMalocclusionpt_BR
dc.subject.otherDentition, mixedpt_BR
dc.subject.otherOrthodontics, interceptivept_BR
dc.titleComparison of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite in the mixed dentition: a randomized trialpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://meridian.allenpress.com/angle-orthodontist/article/88/2/144/59147/Comparison-of-two-early-treatment-protocols-forpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparison of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite in the mixed dentition - a randomized trial.pdf134.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.