1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/55973
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorAgda Marobo Andreottipt_BR
dc.creatorCecília Alves de Sousapt_BR
dc.creatorMarcelo Coelho Goiatopt_BR
dc.creatorEmily Vivianne Freitas da Silvapt_BR
dc.creatorCristiane Duquept_BR
dc.creatorAmália Morenopt_BR
dc.creatorDaniela Micheline dos Santospt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-09T15:04:50Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-09T15:04:50Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.citation.volume12pt_BR
dc.citation.issue2pt_BR
dc.citation.spage176pt_BR
dc.citation.epage183pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/ejd.ejd_50_18pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn13057456pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/55973-
dc.description.resumoObjective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of surface roughness in biofilm formation of four microorganisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida albicans) on acrylic resin surface of ocular prostheses. Materials and methods: Acrylic resin samples were divided into six groups according to polishing: Group 1200S (1200 grit + silica solution); Group 1200; Group 800; Group 400; Group 120 and Group unpolished. Surface roughness was measured using a profilometer and surface images obtained with atomic force microscopy. Microbial growth was evaluated after 4, 24, and 48 hours of incubation by counting colony-forming units. Statistical analysis used: For roughness, it was performed 1-way ANOVA and parametric Tukey test α5% (P ≤ 0.05). For CFU data found, it was applied Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: Group 120 and 400 presented the highest roughness values. For S. epidermidis and S. aureus, Group 1200S presented the lowest values of microbial growth. For E. faecalis at 4 hour, microbial growth was not observed. C. albicans did not adhere to the acrylic resin. Except for Group 1200S, different surface roughnesses did not statistically interfere with microbial adhesion and growth on acrylic surfaces of ocular prostheses. Conclusions: The roughness did not interfere with the microbial adhesion of the microorganisms evaluated. The use of silica decreases significantly microbial growthpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dentistrypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectspt_BR
dc.subject.otherAcrylic resinspt_BR
dc.subject.otherBiofilmspt_BR
dc.subject.otherEye artificialpt_BR
dc.subject.otherCandida Albicanspt_BR
dc.subject.otherBacteriapt_BR
dc.subject.otherSilicon dioxidept_BR
dc.titleIn vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.4103/ejd.ejd_50_18pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
In vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesis.pdf1.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.