1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/56545
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorLeonardo de Oliveira Souzapt_BR
dc.creatorRodrigo de Castro Bernardespt_BR
dc.creatorTúlio Pinho Navarropt_BR
dc.creatorRicardo Jayme Procópiopt_BR
dc.creatorFernando Antônio Roquete Reis Filhopt_BR
dc.creatorLuiz Claudio Moreira Limapt_BR
dc.creatorErnesto Lentz da Silveirapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-17T21:47:59Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-17T21:47:59Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.citation.volume32pt_BR
dc.citation.issue5pt_BR
dc.citation.spage354pt_BR
dc.citation.epage360pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0052pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0102-7638pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/56545-
dc.description.resumoObjective: The disease of the aortic arch is traditionally approached by open surgical repair requiring cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. This study performed a retrospective analysis comparing outcomes through primary hybrid patients submitted to aortic arch surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass with patients submitted to conventional open surgery. Methods: 25 patients submitted to the aortic arch surgery were selected in the period 2003-2012 at the Madre Teresa Hospital in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil; 13 of these underwent hybrid technique without cardiopulmonary bypass and 12 underwent conventional open surgery. Results: The mortality rate for the hybrid group was 23% and for the conventional surgery group was 17% (P=0.248). The postoperative complication rate was also similar in both groups, with no significant difference. Conclusion: Both techniques proved to be similar in mortality and morbidity. However, due to the small sample, more analytical studies with larger samples and long-term follow-up are needed to clarify this issue.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE CIRURGIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgerypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectAortic Aneurysmpt_BR
dc.subjectAortapt_BR
dc.subjectThoracicpt_BR
dc.subjectCardiovascular Surgical Procedurespt_BR
dc.subjectEndovascular Procedurespt_BR
dc.subject.otherAneurisma Aórticopt_BR
dc.subject.otherAortapt_BR
dc.subject.otherProcedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardiovascularespt_BR
dc.subject.otherProcedimentos Endovascularespt_BR
dc.titleHybrid treatment with complete transposition of supra-aortic trunks versus conventional surgery for the treatment of aortic arch aneurysmpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbccv/a/KKP33hsKJ7PWWCn7J4jDb8S/?lang=enpt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8134-5825pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hybrid Treatment with Complete Transposition of Supra-Aortic Trunks versus Conventional Surgery for the Treatment of Aortic Arch Aneurysm.pdf108.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.